Difference between revisions of "Talk:Moving the goalposts"
From Conservapedia
(→Definition?: new section) |
(→Definition?: The term doesn't mean anything. It's a tactic used to avoid answering a question.) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Having never heard of this term before, I went to this article thinking I would see a definition of the term. I think there should be a definition for those of us who don't know what the term means. --[[User:Dfrischknecht|Dfrischknecht]] 13:20, 1 July 2010 (EDT) | Having never heard of this term before, I went to this article thinking I would see a definition of the term. I think there should be a definition for those of us who don't know what the term means. --[[User:Dfrischknecht|Dfrischknecht]] 13:20, 1 July 2010 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : The term doesn't mean anything. It's a tactic used to avoid answering a question.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 16:44, 1 July 2010 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 20:44, July 1, 2010
Removed un-encyclopedic one-sided snark
I removed the un-encyclopedic "As evolutionists are incabable of explaining the wonders of Creation, they often resort to this phrase when pressed by creation scientists in debates, as in "now you're moving the goalposts" in response to a question." and cleaned up the Google statistics. PaulBurnett 12:20, 14 February 2010 (EST)
- What you removed is informative and accurate. We don't censor ideas here, and such deletions are disfavored.--Andy Schlafly 14:06, 14 February 2010 (EST)
Definition?
Having never heard of this term before, I went to this article thinking I would see a definition of the term. I think there should be a definition for those of us who don't know what the term means. --Dfrischknecht 13:20, 1 July 2010 (EDT)
- The term doesn't mean anything. It's a tactic used to avoid answering a question.--Andy Schlafly 16:44, 1 July 2010 (EDT)
