Difference between revisions of "User talk:MountainDew"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m (→‎IRC)
m (Reverted edits by TK (talk) to last revision by DanH)
 
(213 intermediate revisions by 57 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
'''Linux Article'''
+
'''All comments should be posted at User talk:DanH'''
−
Protecting the Linux article may be a bit heavy-handed.  I agree with your last edit, but the article still needs some corrections and could use more in-depth information.  For example, Linux is 'open source' software, not free software, and the sentence 'Whilst desktop machines still overwhelmingly use [[Windows]] software...' should be 'Whilst desktop machines still overwhelmingly use [[Microsoft]] software...'
+
−
--[[User:Brewer13210|Todd]] 14 March 2007
+
  
−
I'll open it back up now. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 14:02, 14 March 2007 (EDT)
+
Archive:
 +
*[[User talk:MountainDewarchive1]]
 +
*[[User talk:MountainDewarchive2]]
  
−
:Actually, "open source" and "free software" are virtually synonymous, except "free software" infers sociocultural concepts. [[User:Linus M.|Geekman314]]<sup>([[User talk:Linus M.|contact me]])</sup> 22:08, 17 March 2007 (EDT)
+
==Edit-Delete conflict==
  
−
== Thanks, tip on deletion ==
+
Wow! My first ever "you deleted, I edited" conflict. There's not even a word for it.
  
−
MountainDew, thanks so much for quick delete.  This is minor, but worthwhile:  you might delete the content box so that the obscene contents are not broadcast further in the "Recent Changes" log.
+
Hey, don't get me wrong, if you think the article can't be salvaged, go ahead and re-delete. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 20:12, 31 March 2007 (EDT)
  
−
I'll track down that contributor's IP address and post my action on [[Conservapedia:Abuse]]
+
I don't have a problem with you salvaging it. See my talk page comment. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 20:13, 31 March 2007 (EDT)
  
−
Thanks again.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 19:44, 17 March 2007 (EDT)
+
:Thanks, I don't want to alienate my best friend at Conservapedia. :-) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 20:22, 31 March 2007 (EDT)
  
−
Due to your excellent contributions to Conservapedia, you have been made a SYSOP.  With these new privileges, you can block any troublesome users by clicking the block button next to their username.  You can also revert vandalism using the method described [[Help talk:Contents|here]].  Please block users guilty of minor vandalism for a short period of time, such as a week or two.  Obscenity and Offensive edits are reason for an infinite block without warning.  Congratulations on becoming a SYSOP! ~ [[User:SharonS|SharonS]] 20:21, 25 February 2007 (EST)
+
== Mining ==
  
−
Your welcome! ~ [[User:SharonS|SharonS]] 20:43, 25 February 2007 (EST)
+
[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Theory_of_evolution&curid=3327&diff=78371&oldid=78363 The definition of quote mining], this edit was done by [[User:Conservative|Conservative]]. I would appreciate some backup when I actually get him to talk, because that edit shows blatant abridging which completely changes the meaning of the quote. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 20:28, 31 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
:I don't want to get deeper into an edit war, so I kindly ask that you undo Conservative's last revision to [[Theory of evolution]]. I don't know you're personal opinions on the subject, but I do know that you're here to build an encyclopedia (being one of the most prolific editors here), and an intentionally mined quote when the full version is in the last revision is unacceptable. I asked Conservative to provide a reason for his reversions, and he has given none. I would appreciate this. Thanks, --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 20:43, 31 March 2007 (EDT)
  
−
Thanks for the welcome. [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] 01:52, 8 March 2007 (EST)
+
== Huey ==
−
== Explaining reversions ==
+
  
−
When reverting as you did [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Dinosaur&curid=6394&diff=17371&oldid=17364 here], it is generally helpful to explain why you choose to revert. [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 17:17, 1 March 2007 (EST)
+
:Even if his ban isn't undone, he can still use email user. You are sure he should be blocked? <font color="#F90404">Geo.</font>[www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Geo.plrd Talk] 22:55, 31 March 2007 (EDT)
  
−
I'll do that in the future. The user in question was obviously trying to be snarky, but that's nothing I couldn't have specified. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 17:27, 1 March 2007 (EST)
+
== Pat Robertson, On feminism ==
  
−
: It didn't strike me as snarky. It seemed to me to be highly reasonable especially since there issues when we use the term "creationist" precisely what we mean, whether YEC or some other form. This is discussed briefly at [[creationism]]. Regardless, it doesn't make much sense to say someone was in a category when everyone in their time period was in that category. It would be like labeling Julius Caesar pagan. [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 17:32, 1 March 2007 (EST)
+
"The feminist agenda is not about equal rights for women. It is about a socialist, anti-family political movement that encourages women to leave their husbands, kill their children, practice witchcraft, destroy capitalism, and become lesbians." -- Pat Robertson, fund-raising letter, 1992
  
−
: I would dispute whether everybody was a creationist in 1841, but I don't think this is really worth arguing over, so if you wish to revert it back, feel free. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 17:35, 1 March 2007 (EST)
+
Why'd you delete it?  He said it, it belongs on the page. --[[User:BDobbs|BDobbs]] 16:38, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
  
−
== Good entry! ==
+
Pat Robertson is "out of the Conservative mainstream"?  Since when?  The guy ran for president as a Republican back in 1988, and Bush Senior certainly didn't treat him like he was just some kook! --[[User:BDobbs|BDobbs]] 16:50, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
  
−
Nice entry on Henry David Thoreau!  Thanks!--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 15:16, 2 March 2007 (EST)
+
== I will let Andy decide about the pic policy ==
  
 +
I will let Andy decide about the pic policy.  I do know that in private schools aborted baby pics are shown. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 01:48, 2 April 2007 (EDT)conservative
  
−
Thanks. I hope to expand on it eventually. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 02:32, 5 March 2007 (EST)
+
== assistance ==
  
−
== Tournament Chess Player ==
+
Wanna block [[User:Theimp?]]
  
−
That's impressive that you're a tournament chess player!  I liked chess but was never very good at it.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:24, 6 March 2007 (EST)
+
== Response ==
  
−
I never actually started taking the game seriously until high school. It just became an addiction for me. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 18:59, 6 March 2007 (EST)
+
I was responding to the state of the Obama article which said that critique indicated that he could not win because he was black.
  
−
Wow, you play chess too?  What's your rating?  Can I have your name to check it out on USCF.org?  Good luck- [[User:Meekrok|Meekrok]]
+
== My appeal to Conservative ==
  
−
==Koronus==
+
Please see Conservative's talk page, at the bottom, and post your opinions on my outlined statements. I would really appreciate your opinion, MD, because you are one of the best editors here. In Christ, --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 00:16, 4 April 2007 (EDT)
−
Don't worry I unblocked him to tweak his block. I found an obscene deleted article floating around . He is now blocked for 1 year. [[User:Geo.plrd|Geo.]] 01:05, 7 March 2007 (EST)
+
  
−
== Edit reverted as vandalism. ==
+
== george w. bush ==
  
−
Regarding [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Unicorn&diff=20130&oldid=20129] it was added by [[User:Conservative]] so I presume it was meant to be serious. [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 20:51, 7 March 2007 (EST)
+
I'm trying to figure out how to do this correctly. I'm requesting that information be added to the george w. bush. Here's what I said on the discussion page;
  
 +
There's no information about how GWB is being named the Worst President in History [http://www.rollingstone.com/news/profile/story/9961300/the_worst_president_in_history] by alot of people, as well as having some of the lowest approval ratings ever.[http://www.hist.umn.edu/~ruggles/Approval.htm][http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/02/27/opinion/polls/main1350874.shtml] And lack of information about major events in his presidency. Such as Katarina, September 11th and stuff like that.
  
−
I think that at the very least, there shouldn't be a statement that implies that the existence of unicorns is definite. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 20:52, 7 March 2007 (EST)
+
Hope I did this right..
  
−
==Staying up Late==
+
*Well, still no signature so users will know who you are.  This is the ''Conserv''apedia, not Wikipedia.  The insertions you are asking about are gossipy, thus against our rules.  Why do you think poll numbers are germain to the article?  Will it make him no longer President?  Will it undo the vote?  No, and several historians, while a President is still in office, rating someone such is moronic. History is the long view, not the short one.  --~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 21:31, 4 April 2007 (EDT)
  
−
Does Jesus know you are staying up late on a Friday night standing guard over Conservapedia?  Shouldn't you be out attempting to be fruitful and multiply?
+
==Nancy Pelosi==
  
−
== Delete and block ==
+
Why did you remove that information?
  
−
Please delete Mecha Jesus again and block the user in question. Thanks. [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 23:57, 9 March 2007 (EST)
 
  
−
== Cheesy potatoes ==
+
It could be worded in a way so as not to call Pelosi a terrorist. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 16:18, 5 April 2007 (EDT)
  
−
I think it was a little trigger-happy of you to delete the article without saying anything in the discussion taking place at [[Talk:Cheesy potatoes]]. It's not too late to discuss it there now. I'm not suggesting you undelete it, but I think the creator of the article should be given a chance to explain.
 
  
−
Entirely guesswork on my part, but I think it was a good-faith if frivolous contribution by a youngish person. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 13:19, 10 March 2007 (EST)
+
I didn't say she was a terrorist, I just said terrorists express support for her.
  
−
P. P. S. At Wikipedia I don't believe this would have been a valid "speedy deletion" (one performed by a sysop without discussion). [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 13:21, 10 March 2007 (EST)
+
== Was was my edit reverted? ==
  
−
== Making conservatives look bad? ==
+
Why did you revert my edit? Do you dispute that the nazi party was right wing? --[[User:C for Conservative|C for Conservative]] 17:52, 5 April 2007 (EDT)
  
−
How am i making conservatives look bad? Scooter Libby is a pariah although liberals don't want to admit it... I thought this site was about the truth--[[User:PatRobertson2008|PatRobertson2008]] 20:30, 10 March 2007 (EST)
+
OK, thanks for fixing that. --[[User:C for Conservative|C for Conservative]] 17:56, 5 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
==Please for to see==
 +
Are we allowed to copy 1:1??
 +
[[Amazing grace| Please view the talk page as well]].
 +
::[[User:Rob Pommer| Cracker]]<sub>[[User_talk:Rob_Pommer|talk]]</sub> 23:38, 5 April 2007 (EDT)
  
−
== The liberal media's already beating up on Gingrich! ==
+
== Why can't my name be in blue like everyone else's? ==
  
−
Poor guy! They were making him look bad in 1995 and it's back again! We need to have his reponse here! I don't want a closet liberal like Giuilani or Mitt Romney to become president!--[[User:PatRobertson2008|PatRobertson2008]] 20:33, 10 March 2007 (EST)
+
Hi Mountain Dew, I'm an Australian contributor to Conservapedia and a good writer and proofreader to boot. Why is my name in plain old black while others have their name in blue and are thus hyperlinked? It's doing my self-esteem ever so much harm. I came to you because I read here that you were an Old World Creationist. I'm a bisexual, atheistic communist revolutionary myself, so naturally I turned to you. MylesP myles325@yahoo.com.au April 6, 2007 AD.
  
−
You'd rather have an admitted adulterer and hypocrite? --[[User:Sandbagger|Sandbagger]] 15:03, 11 March 2007 (EDT)
+
== Biblical Creation Account locked ==
  
−
What are you trying to say?
+
You locked [[Biblical creation account]] (then called "Creation") on 14th March. When did you have in mind to unlock it again?  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 11:20, 6 April 2007 (EDT)
−
And I've never endorsed any political candidate on Conservapedia. I am only trying to remove obvious vandalism. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 15:04, 11 March 2007 (EDT)
+
  
−
== Good block and revert ==
+
== You are doing a great job fighting vandalism ==
  
−
Excellent block and rollback, and locking of the Bush page.  Very well done!  As you did, when it is an obscenity then simply put on an infinite block.  We don't want that block ever expiring. Thanks!--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 20:42, 10 March 2007 (EST)
+
You are doing a great job fighting vandalism!  I just wanted to let you know that someone appreciates your work. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 16:14, 6 April 2007 (EDT)conservative
  
−
P.S. You're absolutely right about being suspicious based on the user id (or screen name).  It's amazing how 95% of the time the user id is an obvious giveaway to the bad intentions.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 20:45, 10 March 2007 (EST)
+
== Great block ==
  
−
Great move in protecting [[Ann Coulter]].  Thanks!--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 15:10, 11 March 2007 (EDT)
+
Great block on WolfieSmith.  You beat me to it!--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:44, 6 April 2007 (EDT)
  
−
== why did you block me? ==
+
== Canada ==
  
−
The first line of that article was entirely evolutionist, I was adding the American view. --[[User:Joseph84|Joseph84]] 19:33, 11 March 2007 (EDT)
+
Sorry to bother you, I'm not trying to start a fight. I'm concerned that CoulterMan is citing dated facts, and not listening to reason when I present it to him. I updated the facts, yet he proceeded to add the dated fact after the one I cited above. As well, he is consistently turning the Canada page into "How Canada Compares to the United States". What are our options for handling this user? --[[User:TrueGrit|TrueGrit]] 23:29, 6 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
:Thank you for locking it. --[[User:TrueGrit|TrueGrit]] 23:32, 6 April 2007 (EDT)
  
−
I didn't block you. Your entry was clearly sarcastic. I only warned you. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 19:35, 11 March 2007 (EDT)
+
== Happy Easter! ==
  
−
== "Sex" page ==
+
Happy Easter to you, Dan!
  
−
I just made a pretty little table on the page, and then protected it from editing. So the page does exist, but without any content but the table. --[[User:Hojimachong|Hojimachong]] 19:47, 11 March 2007 (EDT)
+
'''<small>The eleven disciples went to the hill in Galilee where Jesus had told them to go. When they saw him, they worshiped him, Jesus drew near and said to them, "I have been given all authority in heaven and on earth.  Go, then, to all peoples everywhere and make them my disciples: baptize them in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, and teach them to obey everything I have commanded you. And I will be with you always, to the end of the age."  ''Matthew 28''
 +
<br>    '''Then Peter began to speak: “I now realize how true it is that God does not show favoritism but accepts men from every nation who fear him and do what is right. You know the message God sent to the people of Israel, telling the good news of peace through Jesus Christ, who is Lord of all. You know what has happened throughout Judea, beginning in Galilee after the baptism that John preached— how God anointed Jesus of Nazareth with the Holy Spirit and power, and how he went around doing good and healing all who were under the power of the devil, because God was with him. “We are witnesses of everything he did in the country of the Jews and in Jerusalem. They killed him by hanging him on a tree, but God raised him from the dead on the third day and caused him to be seen. He was not seen by all the people, but by witnesses whom God had already chosen—by us who ate and drank with him after he rose from the dead. He commanded us to preach to the people and to testify that he is the one whom God appointed as judge of the living and the dead. All the prophets testify about him that everyone who believes in him receives forgiveness of sins through his name.”
 +
''—Acts 10:34-43 NIV'''''</small>'''
  
−
== Not Sure ==
+
--~ [[User:TK|TK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 04:40, 8 April 2007 (EDT)
  
−
I'm not quite sure. Ask Andrew, he should know. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 22:41, 11 March 2007 (EDT)
+
== IRC ==
  
−
:It seems as though you've figured it out. How do you do it? --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 22:46, 11 March 2007 (EDT)
+
I have no idea how to use Trillian at all :-\, I tried it and didn't like it, so I went back to using ChatZilla, though I think [[User:TK]] uses Trillian, so you might try asking him. Happy Easter! --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 21:36, 8 April 2007 (EDT)
  
−
== Facebook ==
+
:Quick googling gave [http://www.discarnate.com/boysnextdoor/IRC.html this] and [http://www.gimptalk.com/forum/topic.php?t=18245&start=1 this]. Maybe it helps... --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 21:40, 8 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
==AwaitTawniestmound==
 +
This user is a SirCliff sock. Could you help block the others?<font color="#F90404">Geo.</font>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Geo.plrd Talk] 18:15, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
  
−
Could you send me a Facebook invite? The Email this User link is active for me. Thanks, --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 00:11, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
+
== Liberty ==
  
−
I can't get the link to work. However, you don't have to have an invite to register. I can send you the link to that actual page within the site if you register. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 00:29, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
+
Mountain Dew - that's my favorite soda too!  I'm glad to see you wrote an article about a Liberty professor. Who was it?  If you don't go to school there, what are your connections?  Maybe we have mutual friends?  --[[User:Thammersmith|Thammersmith]] 19:53, 10 April 2007 (EDT)
  
−
OK, thanks for the info. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 00:34, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
+
I just checked out your article on Professor Habermas, to see if there was anything I could add.  Imagine my surprise when I found out that you really got everything down!  It is too bad you couldn't see his speech on the "lost tomb," he did a really great job. I'll try and see if I can find a video of it somewhere, he is an amazing speaker.  --[[User:Thammersmith|Thammersmith]] 20:03, 10 April 2007 (EDT)
  
 +
== Impersonating God? ==
  
−
== Bad Editing ==
+
It hardly seems necessary to ban someone for that--usually, the lack of their posts being rendered in mile-high letters of flame kind of gives it away.  Besides, what if the REAL God posts, and you ban him by accident for being too liberal?  That sort of mix-up could only lead to tragedy and Smitings. --[[User:BDobbs|BDobbs]] 00:28, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
:God himself would probably register as "God" (or "Yahweh" :P). --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 00:29, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
  
−
----
+
== Boxes ==
  
−
Look, I didn't delete everything written before as you allege. Compare the two and you'll see that. All of the previous contributions are there, minus grammar errors and POV stuff. Maybe you should read a little more before you jump to conclusions.... [[User:Romney4King|Romney4King]]
+
Add <nowiki>{{userboxtop|MountainDew}} and {{userboxbottom}}.</nowiki>-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 01:55, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
  
−
There are some differences, but they aren't as substantial as I thought at first, and I do see that your edits produce a well written article, so I'm going to leave it. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 15:14, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
+
== Good old days ==
  
 +
I miss the good old days of massive page move vandal attacks... :-(. Well, not really. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 19:11, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
  
−
== Multiple reversions without explanation ==
+
==Proposed Block Policy==
 +
There has recently been some disagreement over blocks, so I have created a [[User:CPAdmin1/Proposed Block Policy|proposed block policy]]
 +
Tell me what you think. --[[User:CPAdmin1|CPAdmin1]] 23:23, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
  
−
User Ank mangled my contribution, which was factual. Then you go ahead and revert both his mangling of it while deleting my contribution all together. That's not fair. --[[User:Bturpin|Ben]] 15:27, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
 
  
−
I reverted everything he did because he vandalized about 15 pages and I couldn't look at all of them while keeping up with the current wave of vandalism. Feel free to re-incorporate your edits. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 15:28, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
+
==Sysop Pledge==
  
−
== You're the one being biased. ==
+
As my good deed of the day I am requesting that you place this template on your userpage. Participating sysops will earn my respect and gratitude. --[[User:BenjaminS|BenjaminS]] 00:03, 13 April 2007 (EDT)
  
−
"Fair trade" is what the liberals use to cover up the stigma of the protectionism.
+
{{Sysop Pledge}}
  
−
== British English ==
+
== Request unprotection of [[Dick Cheney]] ==
  
−
I don't understand how British spelling is inherently biased whereas American spelling isn't. Perhaps you'd care to explain this. [[User:PraiseTheLard|PraiseTheLard]] 17:54, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
+
Would it be possible to unprotect [[Dick Cheney]]?  I've got a few edits I'd like to make.  The move vandalism that appeared to cause the protection isn't possible anymore, and I've got the page on my watchlist now. --[[User:Interiot|Interiot]] 12:27, 1 April 2007 (EDT)
  
−
== President of the United States ==
+
:Me, too, please. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 19:00, 13 April 2007 (EDT)
−
 
+
−
Hi, I was just adding some details to this article, which you deleted.  Don't you think there should be a bit more detail here?  It just seems to me that, if this is to be an encyclopedia, it ought to have a more detailed account of how something like the Electoral College works.
+
−
 
+
−
[[User:Boethius|Boethius]] 17:59, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
+
−
 
+
−
 
+
−
We both know the general goal of your inclusion of those statements, which is to imply that Bush's election was illegitimate. As this is a Conservative encyclopedia, we don't generally want half of the article of the Electoral College serving as a vehicle for these claims. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 18:01, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
+
−
 
+
−
 
+
−
::Actually, I was trying to revise the article so that it would *not* imply that Bush was not properly elected -- it had been vandalized before I started editing it, and had statements in it about how Bush thinks he is a king.  Look at the version just before the ones I edited and you will see that I was taking that kind of stuff *out*, not putting it in!! 
+
−
 
+
−
[[User:Boethius|Boethius]] 18:06, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
+
−
 
+
−
:Proceed ahead then. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 18:06, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
+
−
 
+
−
== Pi ==
+
−
 
+
−
Why did you revert my post.  Please tell me where I misrepresented the Bible.  Everything I added was properly cited and true.  Can you prove to me that Kings 7:23 doesn't say Pi is 3?  Isn't this a conservative and Christian encyclopedia? Thanks- [[User:Meekrok|Meekrok]]
+
−
 
+
−
Come on, we both know you're being sarcastic here. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 19:01, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
+
−
 
+
−
I may have overreacted, but the page should at least mention the bible says pi is three.  Censorship of the bible is definitely not what Conservapedia is about.  [[User:Meekrok|Meekrok]]
+
−
 
+
−
As long as I can cite a Christian response to the claim (that holds to a 3.14.... value). [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 19:06, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
+
−
 
+
−
== Thanks ==
+
−
 
+
−
Thanks for dealing with that, MountainDew.  I don't like it when people swear at me or on productive content.
+
−
 
+
−
I hope to keep doing good to this site!
+
−
 
+
−
In Him, --[[User:Galaxy001|Zach]]<sup>[[User talk:Galaxy001|send me a message]]</sup> 02:14, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
+
−
 
+
−
Thanks for calling my attention to that! There's a lot of people who want to hurt this site and we need to do all we can to combat it. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 02:14, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
+
−
 
+
−
==Reverting Pages==
+
−
How do you quickly revert pages without having to manually fix all the changes? [[User:ColinR|ColinR]] 05:12, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
+
−
 
+
−
If you're a sysop, you go to recent changes, and click on "hist", then click the "revert" button. If you're not, click "hist" then the date and time of the entry which you want to edit, then click "edit", and save. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 05:13, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
+
−
 
+
−
==Vandals==
+
−
 
+
−
Has it been like this all day? I was having to deal with this for 4 hours this morning.[[User:NSmyth|NSmyth]]18:17, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
+
−
 
+
−
Yep. I don't even have time to write articles anymore. I'm spending all my time dealing with this. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 18:18, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
+
−
 
+
−
:Let's block more quickly, and lock more pages that are repeated targets of vandalism.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 18:36, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
+
−
 
+
−
== Bob Dylan ==
+
−
 
+
−
Just saw your changes to [[Bob Dylan]].  While it's true he has not recorded an explicitly Christian-themed album for some years, he continues to perform the songs of this era, such as "Saved" and "In the Garden", and as far I am aware his faith has not changed or diminished during these years; indeed there is considerable evidence to the contrary; see:
+
−
 
+
−
http://web.utk.edu/~wparr/IsDylanStillChr.html
+
−
 
+
−
which has a number of direct quotes, including a recent concert at which Dylan dedicated "In the Garden" to his hero, Jesus Christ.
+
−
 
+
−
I don't want to get into a debate, but I think you will find this stuff reasonably solid and compelling -- if you do, would you please revert the change you made?
+
−
 
+
−
many thanks,
+
−
 
+
−
[[User:Boethius|Boethius]] 18:22, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
+
−
 
+
−
Feel free to revert it. You seem to know more about Dylan than I do. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 18:23, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
+
−
 
+
−
==Thanks==
+
−
 
+
−
Thanks for taking care of those articles I flagged.--[[User:Elamdri|Elamdri]] 18:31, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
+
−
 
+
−
== Blocking and locking (protecting) ==
+
−
 
+
−
MountainDew, please feel free to block more quickly, and to lock ("protect") pages that you find yourself repeatedly reverting.  Thanks.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 18:35, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
+
−
 
+
−
 
+
−
MountainDew, do you recall the name of the other conservative college student?  Should we make him a SYSOP?  Can you recommend others for SYSOP status?  The person needs only be responsible and we are not limiting this to conservatives.  I just made Elamdri a SYSOP.  Thanks.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 18:56, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
+
−
 
+
−
I think you may be thinking of Daniel B. Douglas, who seemed trustworthy but who joined several days ago and hasn't come back. You might also be thinking of ColinR, who was a big help for me during a wave of vandalism last night. I think he would probably make a good SYSOP. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 18:59, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
+
−
 
+
−
 
+
−
 
+
−
I understand why you blocked the "Kangaroo" page. But could you fix the last paragraph so the scientific and religious explanations aren't co-mingled? It reads funny. Thanks. --[[User:Dave3172|Dave3172]] 19:01, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
+
−
 
+
−
==AwaitingTheRapture==
+
−
 
+
−
Did we get everything?--[[User:Elamdri|Elamdri]] 21:26, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
+
−
 
+
−
I think so. I think the Conservapedia:Abuse was the last one that didn't say "rollback" by his name. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 21:26, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
+
−
 
+
−
Salright!--[[User:Elamdri|Elamdri]] 21:39, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
+
−
 
+
−
I'm still new to this and I'm not sure exactly how the page moves work. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 21:39, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
+
−
 
+
−
Me too. Basically, I move the page, and one I move the page, I go to the offensive redirect page and delete it. That way there is no redirect page.--[[User:Elamdri|Elamdri]] 21:41, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
+
−
 
+
−
== Spoof text on [[Family Friendly]] ==
+
−
 
+
−
Hi, just a note to let you know that some spoofed or vandalistic text has been created at [[Family Friendly]]; this should be removed/changed and the user informed.
+
−
 
+
−
[[User:Boethius|Boethius]] 22:07, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
+
−
 
+
−
Wow!  [[User:Hojimachong]] caught that already!  talk about fast.
+
−
 
+
−
[[User:Boethius|Boethius]] 22:08, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
+
−
 
+
−
== Page Move Vandalism ==
+
−
 
+
−
This is a serious problem; how should we go about dealing with the page-move vandals (I assume the latest three were all the same person), and how do we get the IP from the server? Conservapedia's ban-hammer needs to turn into something more like a "ban-nuke" --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 22:20, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
+
−
 
+
−
:Same guy too.  We need to ban his IP quick. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 23:01, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
+
−
 
+
−
== Thanks, Suggestion ==
+
−
 
+
−
MountainDew, thanks for all your blocks and cleaning up of the obscenity.  Liberals are great, aren't they?  We're starting to track IP addresses to report these vandals and I've posted the jail time imposed by federal law for such obscenity, so they should decline.  Also, I've created more SYSOPs to help.
+
−
 
+
−
One little tip.  When you delete an obscene entry, you might erase the message box on the reason for deletion before confirming the deletion, so that all that filth does not show up on the Recent Changes page.  Otherwise the first part of the content shows up there.  Thanks again.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 00:35, 14 March 2007 (EDT)
+
−
 
+
−
== Terrorism ==
+
−
 
+
−
What was wrong with my edit to [[terrorism]]?  I know Madonna thinks the IRA wasn't a terrorist group, but the UK Government disagreed.
+
−
 
+
−
== Thanks for the opportunity to edit a bit ==
+
−
 
+
−
Thanks for the opportunity to add to "Christianity!"  What a blessing!  I just did a bit to get it going, just off the cuff.  You might want to "close" it up as you had done before! There's always alot that can be added, but it needs to be true and accurate. 
+
−
 
+
−
There is no greater ministry this Conservapedia can do than this!! I'm so excited for you!!  Maintaining the truth of the Bible, the truth about Jesus Christ and what He has done for the world, is going to be challenged by Satan's minions the rest of our lives here.  We will always have this battle.  We fight our sinful flesh and our fellow Christians' sinful flesh, and the enemy.  We have to make sure that what we write corresponds to what is God's written Word in Scripture. and His offer that whoesoever hungers or is thirsty, can come to Him for living water and the Bread of Life.
+
−
 
+
−
May the Lord bring souls to knowledge of Him through Conservapedia!  May the Lord provide for the finances needed, the administration needed, so that truth can prevail.  May there be no fighting amongst true Christians, but let real Christianity shine forth, the Word of God proclaimed.  May the Enemy be put to flight, and my hungry hearts and open ears and minds read the words God places here, and be fed by Him.  We ask this in Jesus' precious name, Amen!!
+
−
 
+
−
 
+
−
== Iraq War ==
+
−
 
+
−
I think you need to revert a couple of versions back. To the one where the Second Gulf War note was added. Affirmlife did heavy editing of items that were properly sourced--[[User:Dave3172|Dave3172]] 13:22, 14 March 2007 (EDT)
+
−
 
+
−
== Great Wall ==
+
−
 
+
−
Just changed the name of it... it's still there. I kept the one with the picture. Sorry for the confusion!
+
−
 
+
−
 
+
−
Ahhh... gotcha. Thanks. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 15:48, 14 March 2007 (EDT)
+
−
 
+
−
 
+
−
== Vandals and Preachers in Christianity ==
+
−
Last night there was a lot of activity in the Christianity section. Someone replaced the entry by a very opinionated sermon which denounced many Christian denominations other than the author's. On top of this there were a fair amount of vandals active that  replaced the entire bit by obscenities. It might be an idea to lock it up again. And maybe warn the vandals.  --[[User:Order|Order]] 15 March:00 (AEST)
+
−
 
+
−
: There is again a lot of vandalism going on at the Christianity entry. It is probably time to lock it for a while. --[[User:Order|Order]] 6March 10:40 (AEST)
+
−
 
+
−
==Vandals messing up fox news and many of my edits==
+
−
MountainDew,
+
−
 
+
−
First of all, I want to thank you for your excellent diaries. Second, I need help. I found out about the site a few days ago, and I started contributing. But Vandals are including obscenities in the Fox News entry, and some one deleted facts from another entry that I made.
+
−
 
+
−
What should I do?
+
−
 
+
−
Thanks in advance,
+
−
--[[User:Octaviohpaz|Octaviohpaz]] 14:24, 15 March 2007 (EDT)
+
−
 
+
−
 
+
−
Thanks, for the answer. I only raise the issue because I fixed it yesterday, and today it was changed again. But I think that you can decide that, and I will back you up. Thanks again.--[[User:Octaviohpaz|Octaviohpaz]] 14:42, 15 March 2007 (EDT)
+
−
 
+
−
==AmesG==
+
−
 
+
−
Thank you. --[[User:Dave3172|Dave3172]] 16:45, 15 March 2007 (EDT)
+
−
 
+
−
==Reply fallen angels==
+
−
 
+
−
I put it up for deletion at the request of User:WhatWouldJesusEdit. Though I don't really think that it should be deleted, his camplaint was valid. Therefore, I thought it reasonable to put the article up for deletion so as to get some disscusion on the matter. --[[User:BenjaminS|BenjaminS]] 00:37, 16 March 2007 (EDT)
+
−
 
+
−
==Hillary Clinton==
+
−
 
+
−
You undid one of my edits, saying "whatreallyhappened is not an acceptable source".  But it wasn't cited for anything except to note that "there were allegations of a coverup."  And there certainly were!  And the link provided many, many pieces of evidence to explain why those allegations were so widespread.  I'd understand the edit if I'd claimed that the link proved that there was a murder and a coverup, but that wasn't the claim.  In fact noting that there were allegations of a coverup is so un-controversial that I could find an MSM citation noting those allegations.  Would that be preferable over citing a site with a conservative bias? [[User:Bwilliston|Bwilliston]] 21:48, 16 March 2007 (EDT)
+
−
 
+
−
== US Senate ==
+
−
 
+
−
I had to undo a couple of your edits on the US Senate page.  Just as an FYI, Lincoln Chafee is no longer in the US Senate.  And the Democrats aren't considered to have the majority because Bernie Sanders and Joe Lieberman are more liberal than average, they have it because those two Senators caucus with the Dmeocrats.  The Democrats offically have the majority of the Senate.  Oh, and there are two senators from each state, not 50.  [[User:Myk|Myk]] 22:18, 16 March 2007 (EDT)
+
−
 
+
−
== CP:AID ==
+
−
 
+
−
Your participation would be welcomed at the newly created [[Conservapedia:Article Improvement Drive]]. Please contact me with any questions, I think this can be a great idea! --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 22:59, 16 March 2007 (EDT)
+
−
 
+
−
== IRC ==
+
  
−
Greetings, MountainDew,
+
== Thank you ==
  
−
[[User:Cracker|Cracker]] and [[User:Linus M.]] have set up an IRC channel for Conservapedia at, originally enough, #conservapedia. Apparently you can send systemwide messages, so we would like you to assist us in getting the word out. Thanks! --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 12:31, 18 March 2007 (EDT)
+
Thank you for unblocking CoulterMan!  Have you read some of his edits?  I never knew that President [[Jimmy Carter]] believed in UFOs and supported space programs so that we could join a galactic civilizations! CoulterMan's stuff is good, and a "nazi" reference is frequently made in American discourse, even if improper.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:39, 13 April 2007 (EDT)
  
 +
== Pledge... ==
  
−
Please stop redirecting obscenities to my page, or I will ask you to be removed. Thank you.
+
I have proudly posted a version of the "Pledge" on my user page, that I can acccept. It includes the Admin guidelines Andy approved, and does not ignore them. --~ [[User:TK|TK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 07:50, 14 April 2007 (EDT)
  
−
[[User:Palmd001|Palmd001]] 15:03, 18 March 2007 (EDT)
+
<div style="width: 550px; text-align: center; border: 1px solid #999; background: #ccc; margin: .5em auto .5em auto; padding: 5px;"><big>'''Sysop Pledge'''</big><br/>As a Conservapedia Sysop, '''''I will never arbitrarily block anyone who is not in violation of the [[Conservapedia Commandments]], and related CP Guidelines.'''''<br/></div>
 +
==You might==
 +
You might want to delete these [[Image:Star Wars Galactic Empire emblem.svg"]] and [[Image:RebelAlliance.jpg]] as they're probably copyright violations. [[User:Rob Pommer| Cracker]]<sub>[[User_talk:Rob_Pommer|talk]]</sub> 18:24, 14 April 2007 (EDT)
  
−
:From my vantage point it looked like an honest mistake. [[User:Cracker|Cracker]]<sup>[[User_Talk:Cracker|talk]]</sup> 15:06, 18 March 2007 (EDT)
+
test [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 04:08, 15 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
==No offense==
 +
I hope you don't take this as some sort of attack but a handy way of making a [http://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Differences_with_Wikipedia#User_names.3F| point]-+-[[User:Rob Pommer| Cracker]]<sub>[[User_talk:Rob_Pommer|talk]]</sub>

Latest revision as of 17:55, June 20, 2017

All comments should be posted at User talk:DanH

Archive:

Edit-Delete conflict

Wow! My first ever "you deleted, I edited" conflict. There's not even a word for it.

Hey, don't get me wrong, if you think the article can't be salvaged, go ahead and re-delete. --Ed Poor 20:12, 31 March 2007 (EDT)

I don't have a problem with you salvaging it. See my talk page comment. MountainDew 20:13, 31 March 2007 (EDT)

Thanks, I don't want to alienate my best friend at Conservapedia. :-) --Ed Poor 20:22, 31 March 2007 (EDT)

Mining

The definition of quote mining, this edit was done by Conservative. I would appreciate some backup when I actually get him to talk, because that edit shows blatant abridging which completely changes the meaning of the quote. --Hojimachongtalk 20:28, 31 March 2007 (EDT)

I don't want to get deeper into an edit war, so I kindly ask that you undo Conservative's last revision to Theory of evolution. I don't know you're personal opinions on the subject, but I do know that you're here to build an encyclopedia (being one of the most prolific editors here), and an intentionally mined quote when the full version is in the last revision is unacceptable. I asked Conservative to provide a reason for his reversions, and he has given none. I would appreciate this. Thanks, --Hojimachongtalk 20:43, 31 March 2007 (EDT)

Huey

Even if his ban isn't undone, he can still use email user. You are sure he should be blocked? Geo.[www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Geo.plrd Talk] 22:55, 31 March 2007 (EDT)

Pat Robertson, On feminism

"The feminist agenda is not about equal rights for women. It is about a socialist, anti-family political movement that encourages women to leave their husbands, kill their children, practice witchcraft, destroy capitalism, and become lesbians." -- Pat Robertson, fund-raising letter, 1992

Why'd you delete it? He said it, it belongs on the page. --BDobbs 16:38, 1 April 2007 (EDT)

Pat Robertson is "out of the Conservative mainstream"? Since when? The guy ran for president as a Republican back in 1988, and Bush Senior certainly didn't treat him like he was just some kook! --BDobbs 16:50, 1 April 2007 (EDT)

I will let Andy decide about the pic policy

I will let Andy decide about the pic policy. I do know that in private schools aborted baby pics are shown. Conservative 01:48, 2 April 2007 (EDT)conservative

assistance

Wanna block User:Theimp?

Response

I was responding to the state of the Obama article which said that critique indicated that he could not win because he was black.

My appeal to Conservative

Please see Conservative's talk page, at the bottom, and post your opinions on my outlined statements. I would really appreciate your opinion, MD, because you are one of the best editors here. In Christ, --Hojimachongtalk 00:16, 4 April 2007 (EDT)

george w. bush

I'm trying to figure out how to do this correctly. I'm requesting that information be added to the george w. bush. Here's what I said on the discussion page;

There's no information about how GWB is being named the Worst President in History [1] by alot of people, as well as having some of the lowest approval ratings ever.[2][3] And lack of information about major events in his presidency. Such as Katarina, September 11th and stuff like that.

Hope I did this right..

  • Well, still no signature so users will know who you are. This is the Conservapedia, not Wikipedia. The insertions you are asking about are gossipy, thus against our rules. Why do you think poll numbers are germain to the article? Will it make him no longer President? Will it undo the vote? No, and several historians, while a President is still in office, rating someone such is moronic. History is the long view, not the short one. --~ TerryK MyTalk 21:31, 4 April 2007 (EDT)

Nancy Pelosi

Why did you remove that information?


It could be worded in a way so as not to call Pelosi a terrorist. MountainDew 16:18, 5 April 2007 (EDT)


I didn't say she was a terrorist, I just said terrorists express support for her.

Was was my edit reverted?

Why did you revert my edit? Do you dispute that the nazi party was right wing? --C for Conservative 17:52, 5 April 2007 (EDT)

OK, thanks for fixing that. --C for Conservative 17:56, 5 April 2007 (EDT)

Please for to see

Are we allowed to copy 1:1?? Please view the talk page as well.

Crackertalk 23:38, 5 April 2007 (EDT)

Why can't my name be in blue like everyone else's?

Hi Mountain Dew, I'm an Australian contributor to Conservapedia and a good writer and proofreader to boot. Why is my name in plain old black while others have their name in blue and are thus hyperlinked? It's doing my self-esteem ever so much harm. I came to you because I read here that you were an Old World Creationist. I'm a bisexual, atheistic communist revolutionary myself, so naturally I turned to you. MylesP myles325@yahoo.com.au April 6, 2007 AD.

Biblical Creation Account locked

You locked Biblical creation account (then called "Creation") on 14th March. When did you have in mind to unlock it again? Philip J. Rayment 11:20, 6 April 2007 (EDT)

You are doing a great job fighting vandalism

You are doing a great job fighting vandalism! I just wanted to let you know that someone appreciates your work. Conservative 16:14, 6 April 2007 (EDT)conservative

Great block

Great block on WolfieSmith. You beat me to it!--Aschlafly 17:44, 6 April 2007 (EDT)

Canada

Sorry to bother you, I'm not trying to start a fight. I'm concerned that CoulterMan is citing dated facts, and not listening to reason when I present it to him. I updated the facts, yet he proceeded to add the dated fact after the one I cited above. As well, he is consistently turning the Canada page into "How Canada Compares to the United States". What are our options for handling this user? --TrueGrit 23:29, 6 April 2007 (EDT)

Thank you for locking it. --TrueGrit 23:32, 6 April 2007 (EDT)

Happy Easter!

Happy Easter to you, Dan!

The eleven disciples went to the hill in Galilee where Jesus had told them to go. When they saw him, they worshiped him, Jesus drew near and said to them, "I have been given all authority in heaven and on earth. Go, then, to all peoples everywhere and make them my disciples: baptize them in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, and teach them to obey everything I have commanded you. And I will be with you always, to the end of the age." Matthew 28
Then Peter began to speak: “I now realize how true it is that God does not show favoritism but accepts men from every nation who fear him and do what is right. You know the message God sent to the people of Israel, telling the good news of peace through Jesus Christ, who is Lord of all. You know what has happened throughout Judea, beginning in Galilee after the baptism that John preached— how God anointed Jesus of Nazareth with the Holy Spirit and power, and how he went around doing good and healing all who were under the power of the devil, because God was with him. “We are witnesses of everything he did in the country of the Jews and in Jerusalem. They killed him by hanging him on a tree, but God raised him from the dead on the third day and caused him to be seen. He was not seen by all the people, but by witnesses whom God had already chosen—by us who ate and drank with him after he rose from the dead. He commanded us to preach to the people and to testify that he is the one whom God appointed as judge of the living and the dead. All the prophets testify about him that everyone who believes in him receives forgiveness of sins through his name.” —Acts 10:34-43 NIV

--~ TK MyTalk 04:40, 8 April 2007 (EDT)

IRC

I have no idea how to use Trillian at all :-\, I tried it and didn't like it, so I went back to using ChatZilla, though I think User:TK uses Trillian, so you might try asking him. Happy Easter! --Hojimachongtalk 21:36, 8 April 2007 (EDT)

Quick googling gave this and this. Maybe it helps... --Sid 3050 21:40, 8 April 2007 (EDT)

AwaitTawniestmound

This user is a SirCliff sock. Could you help block the others?Geo.Talk 18:15, 9 April 2007 (EDT)

Liberty

Mountain Dew - that's my favorite soda too! I'm glad to see you wrote an article about a Liberty professor. Who was it? If you don't go to school there, what are your connections? Maybe we have mutual friends? --Thammersmith 19:53, 10 April 2007 (EDT)

I just checked out your article on Professor Habermas, to see if there was anything I could add. Imagine my surprise when I found out that you really got everything down! It is too bad you couldn't see his speech on the "lost tomb," he did a really great job. I'll try and see if I can find a video of it somewhere, he is an amazing speaker. --Thammersmith 20:03, 10 April 2007 (EDT)

Impersonating God?

It hardly seems necessary to ban someone for that--usually, the lack of their posts being rendered in mile-high letters of flame kind of gives it away. Besides, what if the REAL God posts, and you ban him by accident for being too liberal? That sort of mix-up could only lead to tragedy and Smitings. --BDobbs 00:28, 12 April 2007 (EDT)

God himself would probably register as "God" (or "Yahweh" :P). --Hojimachongtalk 00:29, 12 April 2007 (EDT)

Boxes

Add {{userboxtop|MountainDew}} and {{userboxbottom}}.-AmesGyo! 01:55, 12 April 2007 (EDT)

Good old days

I miss the good old days of massive page move vandal attacks... :-(. Well, not really. --Hojimachongtalk 19:11, 12 April 2007 (EDT)

Proposed Block Policy

There has recently been some disagreement over blocks, so I have created a proposed block policy Tell me what you think. --CPAdmin1 23:23, 12 April 2007 (EDT)


Sysop Pledge

As my good deed of the day I am requesting that you place this template on your userpage. Participating sysops will earn my respect and gratitude. --BenjaminS 00:03, 13 April 2007 (EDT)

Sysop Pledge
As a Conservapedia Sysop, I will NEVER ARBITRARILY block anyone who is not in violation of the Conservapedia Commandments or related CP Guidelines.

Request unprotection of Dick Cheney

Would it be possible to unprotect Dick Cheney? I've got a few edits I'd like to make. The move vandalism that appeared to cause the protection isn't possible anymore, and I've got the page on my watchlist now. --Interiot 12:27, 1 April 2007 (EDT)

Me, too, please. --Ed Poor 19:00, 13 April 2007 (EDT)

Thank you

Thank you for unblocking CoulterMan! Have you read some of his edits? I never knew that President Jimmy Carter believed in UFOs and supported space programs so that we could join a galactic civilizations! CoulterMan's stuff is good, and a "nazi" reference is frequently made in American discourse, even if improper.--Aschlafly 21:39, 13 April 2007 (EDT)

Pledge...

I have proudly posted a version of the "Pledge" on my user page, that I can acccept. It includes the Admin guidelines Andy approved, and does not ignore them. --~ TK MyTalk 07:50, 14 April 2007 (EDT)

Sysop Pledge
As a Conservapedia Sysop, I will never arbitrarily block anyone who is not in violation of the Conservapedia Commandments, and related CP Guidelines.

You might

You might want to delete these File:Star Wars Galactic Empire emblem.svg" and File:RebelAlliance.jpg as they're probably copyright violations. Crackertalk 18:24, 14 April 2007 (EDT)

test MountainDew 04:08, 15 April 2007 (EDT)

No offense

I hope you don't take this as some sort of attack but a handy way of making a point-+- Crackertalk

Retrieved from "https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:MountainDew&oldid=1355282"