Difference between revisions of "Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power v. NRDC"
From Conservapedia
(Replaced content with "You guys make my country look like shit") |
Conservative (Talk | contribs) m (Reverted edits by William on tires (talk) to last revision by DavidB4-bot) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | In '''''Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power v. NRDC''''', 435 U.S. 519 (1978), a unanimous [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that a reviewing court may not generally impose additional procedural requirements on governmental agencies. | |
| + | |||
| + | This opinion, written by Chief Justice [[William Rehnquist]], ended decades of incremental procedural obligations imposed on governmental agencies by the judiciary. This decision constituted a stunning change in direction in administrative law. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Justices [[Lewis Powell]] and [[Harry Blackmun]] took no part in the decision. | ||
| + | [[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]] | ||
Latest revision as of 01:55, March 5, 2017
In Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519 (1978), a unanimous U.S. Supreme Court held that a reviewing court may not generally impose additional procedural requirements on governmental agencies.
This opinion, written by Chief Justice William Rehnquist, ended decades of incremental procedural obligations imposed on governmental agencies by the judiciary. This decision constituted a stunning change in direction in administrative law.
Justices Lewis Powell and Harry Blackmun took no part in the decision.
