Difference between revisions of "Web of Trust (service)"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Undo revision 1190714 by Addict (talk))
m (added to: Category:Internet)
Line 14: Line 14:
 
==External Links==
 
==External Links==
 
[https://www.mywot.com Web of Trust Home Page]
 
[https://www.mywot.com Web of Trust Home Page]
 +
 +
[[Category:Internet]]

Revision as of 20:58, January 4, 2016

Web of Trust is an Internet crowdsourcing service which enables users to rate websites and see the average rating of all others. This may be the largest community rating system for websites.

How it Works

WOT offers plugins for common browsers, so users may install one of these, and rate this way. When a user visits a website which has been given a poor rating on average, a warning is displayed over the page. Also, when a user searches the web using a poplar search engine, WOT shows the community rating of each result. Alternatively, if one does not want to install the plugin or is unable to do so, they may create an account and rate websites online. However, poorly rated sites will not trigger a warning, and search results are not checked.[1]

The Problem

This rating system can work quite well, but there is one big problem: the human factor. In theory, a few misinformed people will not result in inaccuracy, but if enough people are misinformed, or biased, ratings will become inaccurate. This is especially true for political and religious websites. For example, a review on Alliance Defending Freedom's website comments that much of their site is based on fiction, and the idea of "Planned Parenthood selling fetal tissue [has] no basis in fact."[2] Minority sites such as Conservapedia also receive poor ratings, because the majority of WOT users disagree with the sites' contents.

There is also the risk of fraud. It is difficult to defend against this, so one must hope that any attempt at fraud will be overwhelmed by genuine ratings. However, some sites have been successfully attacked by "farmed" reviews. This gives the opposition of WOT a good reason to speak poorly of the service.[3]

References

External Links

Web of Trust Home Page