Conservapedia:AFD Lack of Hygiene

The entire comprehensive, clearly well-researched stub is just another vandal page modeled after the trolling characteristics of DanielAPulido to make Conservapedia look idiotic by calling anything bad a "liberal trait." Could it be that DanielAPulido is a sock of DanAP? —LT ^{Rev. 22:13} Monday, 09:24, September 18, 2023 (EDT)

Vote

• Delete. Orphan page. No substance. That's reason enough. RobS^{Give Peace a Chance!} 10:41, September 18, 2023 (EDT)
• Delete. Concur with RobSmith's point on this one. —LT ^{Rev. 22:13} Monday, 10:43, September 18, 2023 (EDT)

• I must protest however, the way you talk about other editors. "Because Editor X did such and such, therefore..."; that sounds like an awfully Karajouesque and Rationalwikian-type smear. This page is supposed to be used passing judgement on the quality of an article. it is not meant to impugn the integrity of registered users. if you want to trash talk another user, take it to Conservapedia:Kangeroo Court. RobS^{Give Peace a Chance!} 10:49, September 18, 2023 (EDT)

Okay, I see where you're coming from. In this case though, as with many others, it's very plain that the fruit of vandalism stems plainly from an effort to subvert the wiki, and thus the users themselves deserve to be vociferated for the bad faith. —LT ^{Rev. 22:13} Monday, 10:51, September 18, 2023 (EDT)

Oh, are you asking to lead another witchhunt against editors? This is not the place. RobS^{Give Peace a Chance!} 10:52, September 18, 2023 (EDT)

I am an adherent of McCarthyism—Conservapedia needs to be purged of RW Communazi influence. —LT ^{Rev. 22:13} Monday, 10:54, September 18, 2023 (EDT)

(ec) Why don't you begin Conservapedia:Bad faith editing as a supplement to Conservapedia:Guidelines? RobS^{Give Peace a Chance!} 10:56, September 18, 2023 (EDT) RobS^{Give Peace a Chance!} 10:52, September 18, 2023 (EDT)

I am not a qualified expert on rule-writing. While I can identify potential badly worded codes within rules, I would rather not take a leading initiative in writing rules. —LT ^{Rev. 22:13} Monday, 10:57, September 18, 2023 (EDT)

Oh, you just wanna impugn editors with Karajouesque & Rationalwikian type smears? RobS^{Give Peace a Chance!} 10:59, September 18, 2023 (EDT)

I gave sufficient reasoning for my tirade, so they weren't fruitless smears. You merely chose to ignore the trail of evidence that's right there in the open. —LT ^{Rev. 22:13} Monday, 11:00, September 18, 2023 (EDT)

(ec) Do somnething productive, and lay out the types of behavior you deem "bad faith editing". Others will help. RobS^{Give Peace a Chance!} 11:01, September 18, 2023 (EDT)

• I will delete the article. RobS^{Give Peace a Chance!} 11:05, September 18, 2023 (EDT)