Conservapedia:AFD Rapists

According to Conservapedia:Commandments:

“	Any content you create or change (including edits, new pages, images and links) must be informative, family-friendly [emphasis added], clean, concise, and without gossip or foul language.	”
—Rule #3

This category in particular violates the "family-friendly" and "clean" part. Conservapedia is not an encyclopedia primarily obsessed with documenting people convicted of sexual crimes. —LT ^{Rev. 22:13} Monday, 09:27, September 18, 2023 (EDT)

• I'm in agreement here. What's next? Category:Accused rapists so DJT can be added? Half of humanity will end up here. RobS^{Give Peace a Chance!} 11:08, September 18, 2023 (EDT)

It's an orphan Category now anyway. RobS^{Give Peace a Chance!} 11:11, September 18, 2023 (EDT)

When the Category is Deleted, it needs to be Protected against recreation, so if there arises an actual need in the future for the Category, an Admin has to approve it. RobS^{Give Peace a Chance!} 11:12, September 18, 2023 (EDT)

Well, you know that I can't protect pages or titles. —LT ^{Rev. 22:13} Monday, 11:13, September 18, 2023 (EDT)

[EC] "Accused rapists"? Obviously not. Denying due process to lynch alleged "rapists" is a longstanding Democratic Party characteristic, spanning from the Jim Crow era to the Kavanaugh smear. —LT ^{Rev. 22:13} Monday, 11:13, September 18, 2023 (EDT)

If you hold a door open for a woman nowadays you can be accused of inappropriate sexual harassment. RobS^{Give Peace a Chance!} 11:19, September 18, 2023 (EDT)

Wait, actually?? Wow, I guess they really deserve to have the door slammed in their face if they want that end result that much. Those who don't appreciate the little they are given will not receive any more. (I apply this with charity as well) —LT ^{Rev. 22:13} Monday, 11:22, September 18, 2023 (EDT)

Turmp's being accused of slander cause he said, "She's not my type" in response to a woman who accused him of rape. So now a jury has to decide who is and who is not Trump's "type". You have lost the right to determine for yourself which females you find attractive. RobS^{Give Peace a Chance!} 11:24, September 18 2023 (EDT)

[EC]The motivation for convicting Trump on that Trumpist remark alone was stupid. Tasteless? Sure. Automatically indicative of guilt? Obviously not. No wonder the catechumen remain catechumen.

Wait, I individually can't decide whether I like a girl or not? Ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha- ah... no wonder the only people who believe that are the unattractive ones, exclusively the neo-Marxist liberals. Oh yeah, those heathen nutjobs demand "women's rights" and then can't decide what a woman even is. —LT ^{Rev. 22:13} Monday, 11:29, September 18, 2023 (EDT)

We're a collective society. The collective gets to decide which female is a best fit, like arranged marriage. RobS^{Give Peace a Chance!} 11:33, September 18, 2023 (EDT)

Yep, from old progressivism to new progressivism, the eugenics still doesn't go away. —LT ^{Rev. 22:13} Monday, 11:34, September 18, 2023 (EDT)

Tribalism. RobS^{Give Peace a Chance!} 11:43, September 18, 2023 (EDT)