Page history
April 9, 2019
May 9, 2018
October 14, 2017
Reverted edits by Blanker (talk) to last revision by JoeyJ
m+12,310
Blanked the page
-12,310
→Assertions of authenticity
+4
July 23, 2016
June 24, 2016
August 11, 2015
August 9, 2015
August 7, 2015
September 30, 2013
October 14, 2012
June 23, 2011
added images
+483
→Description
m+299
→Description
m+119
no edit summary
m+229
no edit summary
m-114
a little more
m+138
moved specimen table down prior to adding in additional detail
m
June 22, 2011
reverting (and adding link from latest)
+230
→Not a transitional
m+4
improved
+431
Reverted edits by Nzc (talk) to last revision by Karajou
m-661
a little balance to the fraud idea
+854
Deleted unsupported claim that Hoyle's lack of Nobel was due to his Archaeopteryx study
-190
replaced "determined" with "claimed" - since the former presupposes Hoyle was right
-3
May 16, 2011
May 10, 2010
April 15, 2010
January 22, 2010
→Specimens: emphasize how they were all allegedly found in the same area
+81
fix typo, not yet reviewed all the changes
mStarted to work on it, Hoyle led the team, and is not a science nobody. I plan to complete a profile of the team and their 6 findings, 4 of which are already in the article.
+46
December 12, 2009
December 4, 2009
The preeminent British physicist, Sir Fred Hoyle, determined it to be fraudulent.
+35
no edit summary
no edit summary
+10
June 28, 2009
June 9, 2009
March 14, 2009
February 15, 2009
January 15, 2009
January 13, 2009
→First criticism: fraud: how Hoyle was punished
+191
considered by biologists to be the first species of bird to appear on Earth
+198