Page history
July 22, 2023
June 2, 2021
October 28, 2020
October 20, 2020
no edit summary
+4
no edit summary
-3
no edit summary
no edit summary
+98
no edit summary
+43
no edit summary
+7
no edit summary
+132
typo
+2
rmv irrelevent spam; Christianity is not a democracy and the truth of biblical doctrines are not determined by the size of church membership
-2,175
typo
+1
June 27, 2020
February 10, 2020
February 4, 2020
January 30, 2020
→See also: added Inquisition and Burning at the stake, Biblical pretext for
+65
no edit summary
+4
Undo revision 1617919 by RobSmith (talk)redun
-78
No biblical examples
+78
no edit summary
m+24
trim excessive wordiness
-128
no edit summary
-9
no edit summary
m+5
redun
-103
no edit summary
+400
January 29, 2020
January 22, 2020
January 18, 2020
→Protestant theological arguments against infant baptism: after falsehood that some churches teach "all who were baptized into the church as infants are saved forever" - added - "This is an example of the Straw man fallacy."
+49
→Pulpit Commentary
m+1
→Protestant theological arguments against infant baptism
m+38
→Protestant theological arguments against infant baptism: correction - exact wording "There's not one word in the scripture that says, 'If I'm baptized, I'm saved'." time index 8:13-8:19
m-11
no edit summary
+1,306
→Tradition in the New Testament: to phrase "by which he was sanctified" - added - "by apostasy and willful sins of disobedience" just before the refs to He 6:4-12; Rm 2:4-11
m+50
→Tradition in the New Testament: introduced linked article preceding edit with statement "This argument is articulated in the following article:"
m+56
revision - moved Patrick Donahue article link to end of section Tradition in the New Testament as more relevant there after statement so it is possible for a baptized Christian to fall away from salvation by afterward despising as profane the blood..."
→Circumcision and Baptism: link to http://www.biblequery.org/Doctrine/LoseSalvationOrNot/DonahueMorrisonAffirmative1.htm Patrick Donahue’s First Affirmative Against "Once Saved Always Saved"
+1,473
→Circumcision and Baptism: removed footnote referent numbers copied from source of quote in article themelios.thegospelcoalition.org "Does Baptism Replace Circumcision? An Examination of the Relationship between Circumcision and Baptism in Colossians
m-4
January 17, 2020
→Circumcision and Baptism: revised preceding edit of link https://www.defendingthebride.com/sc/baptism.html - quotation re circumcision and baptism
+475
→Circumcision and Baptism: quote re Infant baptism from article https://www.defendingthebride.com/sc/baptism.html Baptism (defendingthebride.com)
+168
→Circumcision and Baptism: added Catholic connection of circumcision and baptism - article https://www.defendingthebride.com/sc/baptism.html - brief quote to follow
+84
→Circumcision and Baptism: quote line "The point not to be missed is that, in Paul’s mind, baptism and circumcision are both signs and seals of Christ’s baptism/circumcision on the cross for us.
+164
→Circumcision and Baptism: corrected display text from bible.knowing-jesus.com - removed irrelevant "Philippians 3:5" at end of quotation Jn 7:23 , included Gn 17:10-14 and correct attribution of Jn 7:23
+370
→Circumcision and Baptism: completed abbreviated title of linked article "Does Baptism Replace Circumcision? An Examination of the... - removed ellipsis and finished line with "Relationship between Circumcision and Baptism in Colossians 2:11-12"
m+77
→Circumcision and Baptism: added line from John Piper article desiringgod.org "Have you been washed by the blood of the Lamb?"
+46
→Colossians 2:8-15: new subheading "Circumcision and Baptism" containing links to online sites variously interpreting the connection between circumcision and baptism
+74
→Tradition in the New Testament: grammar - needed word "as" - "as a sign" - added warning in Rm 2:4-11
m+25
→Tradition in the New Testament: clarification that Paul's statement in Colossians 2:11-12 is interpreted by apologists for paedobaptism as connecting infant circumcision and infant baptism, as being their interpretation of Paul's interpretation !
m+13