Page history
Talk: Censorability
June 7, 2010
June 6, 2010
June 5, 2010
May 29, 2010
→Is Christianity truly censorable?: Many anti-Christians think they can win by censoring Christianity, and in some environments (e.g., liberal college campuses) the censorship does largely prevail
+275
→Is Christianity truly censorable?
+210
→Media: I'd say that a 0.7 or higher rating is accurate for the liberal media in censoring conservative truths
+166
→Media: typo
m-12
new section
+455
→Is Christianity truly censorable?: reply
+281
→Is Christianity truly censorable?: new section
+448
May 28, 2010
no edit summary
+384
→Basis of determining values: thank you. Well done!
+88
→Basis of determining values
+136
moving revised notation to entry itself
-187
excellent, modified notation proposed
+346
→Basis of determining values: formula explained.
+283
→Basis of determining values: formula
+589
→Basis of determining values: But the Tea Party concept is taught more in liberal history textbooks than Christianity is. And I'm not sure how one could censor the Tea Party Movement, while it is
+597
→Basis of determining values: viva la revolution
+263
→Basis of determining values
+400
→Basis of determining values: zero censorability means 100% resilience. In fact, maybe the scale should be on a percentage basis.
+550
→Basis of determining values: new section
+2,213
Classroom prayer would have high censorability, I think
+200
Allocating scores?
+538
no edit summary
-352
no edit summary
+92
Reverted edits by Openwideformywoodtk (Talk) to last revision by Johnb
m→idiots
+220
→idiots: new section
+40
Conservapedia advances knowledge rather than merely regurgitating and distorting it as liberal sources do.
+366
no edit summary
+314
right ... what's next, demanding a source for an arithmetic calculation?
+134