Page history
Talk: Patriot Act/controversy
January 9, 2009
April 10, 2008
April 9, 2008
→Discussion
m+130
→Discussion
+310
those portions aren't the ones that need objecting to, in my view.
+866
→Discussion: HelpJazz, you can and *must* do better than that!
+1,156
→Discussion
+542
Discussion
+1,433
States and cities "resolutions" are meaningless, irrelevant to Federal policy, coming from liberal domainated bodies. strike throughs for speculation, conjecture
+50
This entire section was removed from the main article
+3
Patriot Act/controversy moved to Talk:Patriot Act/controversy: remove from article namespace till this is settled
mHuge editorial problem right from the start
+417
→Controversy: formatting only
m-34
reflist
+13
This is the section of Patriot Act that was removed - restoring so that it can be judged, etc. for reinserting into the article after a consensus
+5,398