Page history
November 2, 2019
June 19, 2019
→Part I: Mary Magdalene, Wife of the Messiah?: punctuation - quote marks within a quotation are normally single quote marks not double
m→Part I: Mary Magdalene, Wife of the Messiah?: added "Magadalene" as clarification that "Mary was never tied to any male when she was named" refers to Mary Magdalene - "Mary Magdalene was never tied to any male when she was named"
m+10
→Part I: Mary Magdalene, Wife of the Messiah?: closing brackets missing - added brackets and text below image - clicked edit page Show preview, image appeared - saved page
+53
September 15, 2018
December 27, 2016
June 29, 2016
June 27, 2016
January 21, 2015
August 1, 2014
October 19, 2011
February 14, 2011
June 24, 2010
April 17, 2010
January 10, 2010
July 21, 2009
correcting spelling and fixing link
m+2
removing inaccurate and biased section and restoring deleted information
+29,547
January 19, 2009
November 13, 2008
August 10, 2008
August 6, 2008
→Introduction
+4
→Introduction
+223
→Plot Summary
-277
→Introduction
+196
→Introduction
-540
Please put thoughts in talk first before altering article
+54
If it's alternate history, then isn't it a given that it will change the record? It's redundant. Religious experience line is awkward and uses slightly loaded word choice.
-54
August 5, 2008
A "skeptic" and "believer" of what? The second paragraph comes across as odd
-36
Redundancy, no evidence of intentional attack, quotes around "novel" unneeded and confusing.
m-21