| Line 12: |
Line 12: |
| | |- | | |- |
| | |2 | | |2 |
| − | |[http://www.wnd.com/ WorldNetDaily]
| |
| − | |has reporters at conservative events; moved to number 1 with its candid and courageous reporting about the [[homosexual agenda]]; has also had excellent reporting on the [[Obama]] birth certificate issue
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |3
| |
| | |[http://patriotupdate.com Patriot Update] | | |[http://patriotupdate.com Patriot Update] |
| | |Founded in 2009, [[Patriot Update]] is a leading [[conservative]] news source for the everyday American. | | |Founded in 2009, [[Patriot Update]] is a leading [[conservative]] news source for the everyday American. |
| | |- | | |- |
| − | |4 | + | |3 |
| | |[http://newsbusters.org/ Newsbusters] | | |[http://newsbusters.org/ Newsbusters] |
| | |insightful, original, and good across all issues; exposes liberal deceit well | | |insightful, original, and good across all issues; exposes liberal deceit well |
| | |- | | |- |
| − | |5 | + | |4 |
| | |[http://www.lifesitenews.com/ LifeSiteNews] | | |[http://www.lifesitenews.com/ LifeSiteNews] |
| | |terrific focus on [[pro-life]] and other moral issues; savvy and original ... and doesn't suffer fools lightly | | |terrific focus on [[pro-life]] and other moral issues; savvy and original ... and doesn't suffer fools lightly |
| | |- | | |- |
| − | |6 | + | |5 |
| | |[http://www.breitbart.com/ Breitbart] | | |[http://www.breitbart.com/ Breitbart] |
| | |breaks some big stories and exposes [[liberal deceit]] well | | |breaks some big stories and exposes [[liberal deceit]] well |
| | |- | | |- |
| − | |7 | + | |6 |
| | |[http://www.onenewsnow.com OneNewsNow] | | |[http://www.onenewsnow.com OneNewsNow] |
| | |a division of the American Family News Network, reporting on general news with liberal selection bias | | |a division of the American Family News Network, reporting on general news with liberal selection bias |
| | |- | | |- |
| − | |8 | + | |7 |
| | |[http://www.lifenews.com/ Lifenews] | | |[http://www.lifenews.com/ Lifenews] |
| | |has lots of [[abortion]]-related stories, and prioritizes them well, but is not critical enough of politicians who pretend to be pro-life | | |has lots of [[abortion]]-related stories, and prioritizes them well, but is not critical enough of politicians who pretend to be pro-life |
| | |- | | |- |
| − | |9 | + | |8 |
| | |[http://hotair.com/ Hotair] | | |[http://hotair.com/ Hotair] |
| | |typically links to other stories, often with a [[neoconservative]] emphasis rather than socially conservative | | |typically links to other stories, often with a [[neoconservative]] emphasis rather than socially conservative |
| | + | |- |
| | + | |9 |
| | + | |''[[Washington Times]]'' |
| | + | |a conservative news source from the nation's capital |
| | |- | | |- |
| | |10 | | |10 |
| − | |[http://www.redstate.com/ RedState] | + | |[http://www.wnd.com/ WorldNetDaily] |
| − | |timely and good volume, with focus on economic, government and election issues | + | |good on some issues, but allowed a column that savaged Todd Akin |
| | |- | | |- |
| | |11 | | |11 |
| − | |''[[Washington Times]]'' | + | |[http://www.redstate.com/ RedState] |
| − | |a conservative news source from the nation's capital | + | |unhelpful or worse on social issues, such as piling on against Todd Akin amid the [[media bullying]] |
| | |- | | |- |
| | |12 | | |12 |