Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
294,721
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 278:
Line 278: − +
typo
:::But of course, you know that. --[[User:PF Fox|PF Fox]] 21:47, 15 April 2007 (EDT)
:::But of course, you know that. --[[User:PF Fox|PF Fox]] 21:47, 15 April 2007 (EDT)
::::So you are connecting the dots with the evidence, or making leaps of judgement and conclusions. Sorry, but I'm pretty meticulous about historical methodology, and it's just become a habit of second nature of mine. We are discussing three issues, (1) Pinochet's relationship to the Chilean government before and after the coup; (2) CIA involvement prior and after teh coup; (3) "Many in the US protested" after the coup, although you '''''still''''' have not made clear '''what they protested''', what is (a) CIA invovlement, or (b) human rights abuses. All three issues deserve treatment, however all three issues must be treated separately and cannot be used to confuse the known historical facts supported by three investigations and their publiched results. A further suggestion to clarify things, eleiniate this bogus, unsourcedm, without reference to a timeframe claim of anonymous "many in the US" and produce a specific cite, attributable to specific, reputable person of group with a specific date of thier "protest'. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 22:22, 15 April 2007 (EDT)
::::So you are connecting the dots with the evidence, or making leaps of judgement and conclusions. Sorry, but I'm pretty meticulous about historical methodology, and it's just become a habit of second nature of mine. We are discussing three issues, (1) Pinochet's relationship to the Chilean government before and after the coup; (2) CIA involvement prior and after the coup; (3) "Many in the US protested" after the coup, although you '''''still''''' have not made clear '''what they protested''', what is (a) CIA invovlement, or (b) human rights abuses. All three issues deserve treatment, however all three issues must be treated separately and cannot be used to confuse the known historical facts supported by three investigations and their publiched results. A further suggestion to clarify things, eleiniate this bogus, unsourcedm, without reference to a timeframe claim of anonymous "many in the US" and produce a specific cite, attributable to specific, reputable person of group with a specific date of thier "protest'. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 22:22, 15 April 2007 (EDT)