SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
3,266
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1,173:
Line 1,173: + + + + + + + + + +
Conservapedia:Community Portal (view source)
Revision as of 06:16, June 12, 2015
, 06:16, June 12, 2015→Anonymous threats against me: new section
::Okay, I left the messages. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] 21:17, 10 June 2015 (EDT)
::Okay, I left the messages. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] 21:17, 10 June 2015 (EDT)
:::With a suggestion from AugustO, I fixed the problem. Problem solved. See: http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Aschlafly#Template:Cquote_problem [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 01:58, 11 June 2015 (EDT)
:::With a suggestion from AugustO, I fixed the problem. Problem solved. See: http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Aschlafly#Template:Cquote_problem [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 01:58, 11 June 2015 (EDT)
== Anonymous threats against me ==
Cons has just warned me on my [[User talk:SamHB#regarding content creation|talk page]] that he has received email communications from someone threatening to block my account because I have not been creating enough content, and I need to create substantially more. Aside from the fact that blocking an account is probably not a good way to get more content creation, I believe that I am one of the more active contributors at present. By my count, since late March I made contributions to nearly 90 ''different'' non-talk non-Community-Portal pages.
Can anyone shed some light on this? If you want to contact me privately, I'm at sam4557@gmail.com.
One a subject that may or may not be related, I see a comment a little higher on this page, characterizing an edit I made as an "architechtonic example of...Science...at its fullest". It had absolutely nothing to do with science. I was simply ridiculing TAR's apparent wish to be treated as a superhero with a secret identity. Also, [[Talk:Parrot#No_Credit_Where_Credit_is_Not_Due]] has a complaint that "SamHB embraces the pseudoscience that leavens science too tightly to be trusted". Anyone who believes that I embrace pseudoscience, or that I "leaven science too tightly to be trusted" (huh?) is urged to explain this belief in detail.
[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 02:16, 12 June 2015 (EDT)