SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
3,266
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 1,180:
Line 1,180: − One a subject that may or may not be related, I see a comment a little higher on this page, characterizing an edit I made as an "architechtonic example of...Science...at its fullest". It had absolutely nothing to do with science. I was simply ridiculing TAR's apparent wish to be treated as a superhero with a secret identity. Also, [[Talk:Parrot#No_Credit_Where_Credit_is_Not_Due]] has a complaint that "SamHB embraces the pseudoscience that leavens science too tightly to be trusted". Anyone who believes that I embrace pseudoscience, or that I "leaven science too tightly to be trusted" (huh?) is urged to explain this belief in detail.+
Conservapedia:Community Portal (view source)
Revision as of 06:20, June 12, 2015
, 06:20, June 12, 2015→Anonymous threats against me
Can anyone shed some light on this? If you want to contact me privately, I'm at sam4557@gmail.com.
Can anyone shed some light on this? If you want to contact me privately, I'm at sam4557@gmail.com.
On a subject that may or may not be related, I see a comment a little higher on this page, characterizing an edit I made as an "architechtonic example of...Science...at its fullest". It had absolutely nothing to do with science. I was simply ridiculing TAR's apparent wish to be treated as a superhero with a secret identity. Also, [[Talk:Parrot#No_Credit_Where_Credit_is_Not_Due]] has a complaint that "SamHB embraces the pseudoscience that leavens science too tightly to be trusted". Anyone who believes that I embrace pseudoscience, or that I "leaven science too tightly to be trusted" (huh?) is urged to explain this belief in detail.
[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 02:16, 12 June 2015 (EDT)
[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 02:16, 12 June 2015 (EDT)