With the book's blatant appeal to [[liberal]] wishful thinking, the website quickly attracted a massive amount of liberal users, who soon outnumbered conservative users and drew false authority from the [[logical fallacy]] of proof by numbers to shout down any conservative argument with waves of illogical rebuttals and [[strawmen]]. While the presence of a forum on the website could have allowed it to become a vein for conservatives to demonstrate the superiority of their position and rebut many of the points presented in the book and by liberalism at large, the overwhelming population of liberals make it impossible, as any point that does not line up with their twisted worldview is dismissed out-of-hand and falsely mocked as incorrect. Repeated claims of bias to the site admins have gone unanswered, indicating that the [[liberal bias]] is not only present among the common users but also among those who are supposed to ensure fair debate.
+
With the book's blatant appeal to [[liberal]] [[wishful thinking]], the website quickly attracted a massive amount of liberal users, who soon outnumbered conservative users and drew false authority from the [[logical fallacy]] of proof by numbers to shout down any conservative argument with waves of illogical rebuttals and [[strawmen]]. While the presence of a forum on the website could have allowed it to become a vein for conservatives to demonstrate the superiority of their position and rebut many of the points presented in the book and by liberalism at large, the overwhelming population of liberals make it impossible, as any point that does not line up with their twisted worldview is dismissed out-of-hand and falsely mocked as incorrect. Repeated claims of bias to the site admins have gone unanswered, indicating that the [[liberal bias]] is not only present among the common users but also among those who are supposed to ensure fair debate.
===Evidence of Liberal Bias in Site Administration===
===Evidence of Liberal Bias in Site Administration===