SkipCaptcha
422
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 158:
Line 158: + +
no edit summary
:Regarding vandalism, I'll try to find an admin next time. I just didn't know if there was some special way. I did know some about history and mass vs. single reverts, but thanks. I did do single undos on this page and one other I was working on, but didn't bother with any others. It seems he/she went to my site, also, and posted some x-rated stuff on the support forum. I suppose that's his/her way of harassing contributors, but it's no harder to ban there than it is here. I'm not sure I'd call vandalism "exciting" to me; perhaps it would best be called bemusing, because it is entirely pointless, yet they keep trying.
:Regarding vandalism, I'll try to find an admin next time. I just didn't know if there was some special way. I did know some about history and mass vs. single reverts, but thanks. I did do single undos on this page and one other I was working on, but didn't bother with any others. It seems he/she went to my site, also, and posted some x-rated stuff on the support forum. I suppose that's his/her way of harassing contributors, but it's no harder to ban there than it is here. I'm not sure I'd call vandalism "exciting" to me; perhaps it would best be called bemusing, because it is entirely pointless, yet they keep trying.
:As always, thanks for you input and assistance!
:As always, thanks for you input and assistance!
::Thank you. Sorry that I did not reply earlier, but I do not always have time to edit. I will try to improve my skills. Speaking of what Sam said, I wrote an article [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Millipede&diff=prev&oldid=1190358] on millipedes. I used the Britannica article [http://www.britannica.com/animal/millipede] as a framework. I deleted it, thinking it plagiarism, but Sam's words seem to imply that it is okay. Compare my article with Britannica's and see if it is okay to restore my article. [[User:U.U|U.U]] ([[User talk:U.U|talk]]) 18:58, 9 January 2016 (EST)