SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
3,266
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 160:
Line 160: +
→Vandal: millipedes
::Thank you. Sorry that I did not reply earlier, but I do not always have time to edit. I will try to improve my skills. Speaking of what Sam said, I wrote an article [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Millipede&diff=prev&oldid=1190358] on millipedes. I used the Britannica article [http://www.britannica.com/animal/millipede] as a framework. I deleted it, thinking it plagiarism, but Sam's words seem to imply that it is okay. Compare my article with Britannica's and see if it is okay to restore my article. [[User:U.U|U.U]] ([[User talk:U.U|talk]]) 18:58, 9 January 2016 (EST)
::Thank you. Sorry that I did not reply earlier, but I do not always have time to edit. I will try to improve my skills. Speaking of what Sam said, I wrote an article [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Millipede&diff=prev&oldid=1190358] on millipedes. I used the Britannica article [http://www.britannica.com/animal/millipede] as a framework. I deleted it, thinking it plagiarism, but Sam's words seem to imply that it is okay. Compare my article with Britannica's and see if it is okay to restore my article. [[User:U.U|U.U]] ([[User talk:U.U|talk]]) 18:58, 9 January 2016 (EST)
:::I haven't had time to check this yet, so I can't really say whether it's OK. I'll try to get to it. Meanwhile, if anyone else can look at it, that would be good. But the current state, by AWagner, ("very large number of legs") has got to go. It looks childish. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 19:08, 9 January 2016 (EST)