Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 100: Line 100:     
:Certainly true of the Original Series (and the Next Generation was even worse), but Deep Space 9, made after the militant atheist creator had died, portrays religion (specifically the Bajoran one) in a clearly positive light.--[[User:ArchModerate|ArchModerate]] 15:46, 25 March 2013 (EDT)
 
:Certainly true of the Original Series (and the Next Generation was even worse), but Deep Space 9, made after the militant atheist creator had died, portrays religion (specifically the Bajoran one) in a clearly positive light.--[[User:ArchModerate|ArchModerate]] 15:46, 25 March 2013 (EDT)
 +
 +
::Deep Space Nine, Voyager, and possibly Enterprise can probably stay on here, but Star Trek and The Next Generation, definitely not.
 +
::There is one question, though. I'm probably a bit clueless regarding this, so forgive me for asking, but how exactly does Star Fleet's HQ being in San Francisco indicate anything about politics, much less it being of the left? There have been conservative elements in there, believe it or not. For starters, the March for Life back in 2011. There was also a law that explicitly violated homosexual marriages, and the mayor and clerk got into deep trouble as well.
 +
::I'm a bible-believing Christian, but I wouldn't necessarily rule out the existence of Vulcans or aliens. Space is a vast area, and I find it hard to believe God would make most of the universe lifeless save for Earth, so I'm not exactly sure that's evidence about the show being leftist. The bit about the USA no longer existing as a sovereign nation but instead being part of a one world government that was socialistic in nature and acts more like a United Nations in the form of the Federation of Planets, and religion, IF portrayed or even mentioned at all, is denigrated, and the overall promotion of socialism, multiculturalism, and even relaxation of sexual morality (Captain Kirk's infamous escapades is one notable example) certainly disqualifies TNG and even TOS from even being remotely conservative and if anything more likely liberal. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 08:05, 28 February 2016 (EST)
    
== No Duck Dynasty?  ==
 
== No Duck Dynasty?  ==
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
5,230

edits

Navigation menu