Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,516
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 13:
Line 13: − +
Talk:Arguments for a recent creation (view source)
Revision as of 18:27, March 24, 2016
, 18:27, March 24, 2016→Tree rings
The article says that "Tree rings, including rings on petrified forest trees, can't be traced back more than some thousands of years." This claim is not true. In some cases tree rings give an unbroken record back more than 11,000 years. [http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CG/CG010.html] --[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] ([[User talk:JoeyJ|talk]]) 15:24, 18 March 2016 (EDT)
The article says that "Tree rings, including rings on petrified forest trees, can't be traced back more than some thousands of years." This claim is not true. In some cases tree rings give an unbroken record back more than 11,000 years. [http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CG/CG010.html] --[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] ([[User talk:JoeyJ|talk]]) 15:24, 18 March 2016 (EDT)
:See: http://creation.com/tree-ring-dating-dendrochronology and http://www.icr.org/article/tree-rings-biblical-chronology/ and http://www.creationresearch.org/crsq/articles/26/26_1a.html [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 14:24, 24 March 2016 (EDT)
:See tree rings don't show that the earth is more than about 6,000 years old: http://creation.com/tree-ring-dating-dendrochronology and http://www.icr.org/article/tree-rings-biblical-chronology/ and http://www.creationresearch.org/crsq/articles/26/26_1a.html [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 14:24, 24 March 2016 (EDT)