SkipCaptcha
1,279
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 14:
Line 14: + + + +
Talk:Arguments for a recent creation (view source)
Revision as of 15:37, September 17, 2017
, 15:37, September 17, 2017→Merge with Counterexamples to an Old Earth?: new section
The article says that "Tree rings, including rings on petrified forest trees, can't be traced back more than some thousands of years." This claim is not true. In some cases tree rings give an unbroken record back more than 11,000 years. [http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CG/CG010.html] --[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] ([[User talk:JoeyJ|talk]]) 15:24, 18 March 2016 (EDT)
The article says that "Tree rings, including rings on petrified forest trees, can't be traced back more than some thousands of years." This claim is not true. In some cases tree rings give an unbroken record back more than 11,000 years. [http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CG/CG010.html] --[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] ([[User talk:JoeyJ|talk]]) 15:24, 18 March 2016 (EDT)
:See tree rings don't show that the earth is more than about 6,000 years old: http://creation.com/tree-ring-dating-dendrochronology and http://www.icr.org/article/tree-rings-biblical-chronology/ and http://www.creationresearch.org/crsq/articles/26/26_1a.html [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 14:24, 24 March 2016 (EDT)
:See tree rings don't show that the earth is more than about 6,000 years old: http://creation.com/tree-ring-dating-dendrochronology and http://www.icr.org/article/tree-rings-biblical-chronology/ and http://www.creationresearch.org/crsq/articles/26/26_1a.html [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 14:24, 24 March 2016 (EDT)
== Merge with Counterexamples to an Old Earth? ==
Should this page be merged with [[Counterexamples to an Old Earth]] as they are two pages with the same purpose? [[User:FredericBernard|FredericBernard]] ([[User talk:FredericBernard|talk]]) 11:37, 17 September 2017 (EDT)