Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:  
''Conservapedia'' is in a unique position to rank other information sources of all types.  Please see our nominations below the table, and fill in others as you like.
 
''Conservapedia'' is in a unique position to rank other information sources of all types.  Please see our nominations below the table, and fill in others as you like.
   −
{| class="wikitable"
  −
|-
  −
!Rank
  −
!Information Source
  −
!Comments
  −
|-
  −
|1
  −
|[http://www.thegatewaypundit.com GatewayPundit]
  −
|Tremendous writing, with a rapier wit, and the national leader in breaking honest news on big stories like the events in Ferguson, Missouri
  −
|-
  −
|2
  −
|[http://www.cnsnews.com/home Cybercast News]
  −
|uniquely informative news across all issues, including social ones; a top-quality news site in every respect
  −
|-
  −
|3
  −
|[http://patriotupdate.com Patriot Update]
  −
|Founded in 2009, [[Patriot Update]] is a leading [[conservative]] news source for the everyday American.
  −
|-
  −
|4
  −
|[http://newsbusters.org/ Newsbusters]
  −
|insightful, original, and good across all issues; exposes liberal deceit well
  −
|-
  −
|5
  −
|[http://www.lifesitenews.com/ LifeSiteNews]
  −
|terrific focus on [[pro-life]] and other moral issues; savvy and original ... and doesn't suffer fools lightly
  −
|-
  −
|6
  −
|[http://www.conservativenewsandviews.com Conservative News and Views]
  −
|relatively new, covers a variety of conservative issues but mostly politics
  −
|-
  −
|7
  −
|[http://www.breitbart.com/ Breitbart]
  −
|breaks some big stories and exposes [[liberal deceit]], and getting better on social issues
  −
|-
  −
|8
  −
|''The Hill''
  −
|terrific source of news from Washington, D.C., without [[liberal bias]]
  −
|-
  −
|9
  −
|[http://www.onenewsnow.com OneNewsNow]
  −
|a division of the American Family News Network, reporting on general news with liberal selection bias
  −
|-
  −
|10
  −
|[http://www.lifenews.com/ Lifenews]
  −
|has lots of [[abortion]]-related stories, and prioritizes them well, but is not critical enough of politicians who pretend to be pro-life
  −
|-
  −
|11
  −
|[http://hotair.com/ Hotair]
  −
|typically links to other stories, often with a [[neoconservative]] emphasis rather than socially conservative
  −
|-
  −
|12
  −
|''[[Washington Times]]''
  −
|a conservative news source from the nation's capital
  −
|-
  −
|13
  −
|[http://www.wnd.com/ WorldNetDaily]
  −
|good on some issues, but allowed a column that savaged Todd Akin
  −
|-
  −
|14
  −
|[http://www.redstate.com/ RedState]
  −
|unhelpful or worse on social issues, such as piling on against Todd Akin amid the [[media bullying]]
  −
|-
  −
|15
  −
|''[http://www.politico.com Politico]''
  −
|left-leaning but a good source of information from a liberal perspective
  −
|-
  −
|16
  −
|''[[Fox News]]''
  −
|high volume of info, but censors many [[conservative]]s<ref>Conservatives censored (or subjected to hostile interviews) by Fox News include [[Newt Gingrich]] (after Fox News decided to back Mitt Romney), [[Ron Paul]], [[Pat Buchanan]], Tom Pauken, Rev. Tom Euteneuer, [[Michael Steele]], [[J.D. Hayworth]], [[Steve Lonegan]] and [[Tom Coburn]]; [[Sharron Angle]] was rarely on Fox News, far less than [[John McCain]] was, even though Angle's race was far more important than McCain's.</ref> and downplays the social issues (for example, see: [[Fox News and homosexuality]])
  −
|-
  −
|17
  −
|''[[Christian Science Monitor]]''
  −
|refreshing in its lack of [[lamestream media]] liberal bias
  −
|-
  −
|18
  −
|''[[USA Today]]''
  −
|better than the [[lamestream media]] in its reporting on state-by-state news, and its greater balance; but it has been very [[feminist]] and one-sided in its reporting on [[Title IX]] in college sports; also may be more anti-[[Catholic]] than other liberal sources
  −
|-
  −
|19
  −
|''Orange County Register''
  −
|the newspaper for the region that once propelled [[Ronald Reagan]] to become the governor of [[California]], and then the [[President]] of the [[United States]]
  −
|-
  −
|20
  −
|''Financial Times''
  −
|more conservative than the [[Wall Street Journal]]
  −
|-
  −
|21
  −
|''Voice of America''
  −
|worth reading from time to time
  −
|-
  −
|22
  −
|[http://www.examiner.com/creationism-in-national/terry-hurlbut Terry Hurlbut]
  −
|CP administrator Terry Hurlbut at the Examiner
  −
|-
  −
|23
  −
|[http://www.prolifeblogs.com/ Pro-life blogs]
  −
|a good compendium of blogging on the pro-life issue
  −
|-
  −
|24
  −
|[http://1461days.blogspot.com/ the 1461]
  −
|following the Obama Administrations use and Abuse of the Executive Order and more
  −
|-
  −
|25
  −
|Junkscience
  −
|exposing the [[global warming]] hoax and other liberal falsehoods masquerading as science
  −
|-
  −
|26
  −
|[http://www.miamiherald.com/ Miami Herald]
  −
|Not as [[liberal]] as most American newspapers, and a good source of Latin American news.
  −
|-}
      
== See also ==
 
== See also ==
Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,531

edits

Navigation menu