| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| | ''Conservapedia'' is in a unique position to rank other information sources of all types. Please see our nominations below the table, and fill in others as you like. | | ''Conservapedia'' is in a unique position to rank other information sources of all types. Please see our nominations below the table, and fill in others as you like. |
| | | | |
| − | {| class="wikitable"
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | !Rank
| |
| − | !Information Source
| |
| − | !Comments
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |1
| |
| − | |[http://www.thegatewaypundit.com GatewayPundit]
| |
| − | |Tremendous writing, with a rapier wit, and the national leader in breaking honest news on big stories like the events in Ferguson, Missouri
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |2
| |
| − | |[http://www.cnsnews.com/home Cybercast News]
| |
| − | |uniquely informative news across all issues, including social ones; a top-quality news site in every respect
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |3
| |
| − | |[http://patriotupdate.com Patriot Update]
| |
| − | |Founded in 2009, [[Patriot Update]] is a leading [[conservative]] news source for the everyday American.
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |4
| |
| − | |[http://newsbusters.org/ Newsbusters]
| |
| − | |insightful, original, and good across all issues; exposes liberal deceit well
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |5
| |
| − | |[http://www.lifesitenews.com/ LifeSiteNews]
| |
| − | |terrific focus on [[pro-life]] and other moral issues; savvy and original ... and doesn't suffer fools lightly
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |6
| |
| − | |[http://www.conservativenewsandviews.com Conservative News and Views]
| |
| − | |relatively new, covers a variety of conservative issues but mostly politics
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |7
| |
| − | |[http://www.breitbart.com/ Breitbart]
| |
| − | |breaks some big stories and exposes [[liberal deceit]], and getting better on social issues
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |8
| |
| − | |''The Hill''
| |
| − | |terrific source of news from Washington, D.C., without [[liberal bias]]
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |9
| |
| − | |[http://www.onenewsnow.com OneNewsNow]
| |
| − | |a division of the American Family News Network, reporting on general news with liberal selection bias
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |10
| |
| − | |[http://www.lifenews.com/ Lifenews]
| |
| − | |has lots of [[abortion]]-related stories, and prioritizes them well, but is not critical enough of politicians who pretend to be pro-life
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |11
| |
| − | |[http://hotair.com/ Hotair]
| |
| − | |typically links to other stories, often with a [[neoconservative]] emphasis rather than socially conservative
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |12
| |
| − | |''[[Washington Times]]''
| |
| − | |a conservative news source from the nation's capital
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |13
| |
| − | |[http://www.wnd.com/ WorldNetDaily]
| |
| − | |good on some issues, but allowed a column that savaged Todd Akin
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |14
| |
| − | |[http://www.redstate.com/ RedState]
| |
| − | |unhelpful or worse on social issues, such as piling on against Todd Akin amid the [[media bullying]]
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |15
| |
| − | |''[http://www.politico.com Politico]''
| |
| − | |left-leaning but a good source of information from a liberal perspective
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |16
| |
| − | |''[[Fox News]]''
| |
| − | |high volume of info, but censors many [[conservative]]s<ref>Conservatives censored (or subjected to hostile interviews) by Fox News include [[Newt Gingrich]] (after Fox News decided to back Mitt Romney), [[Ron Paul]], [[Pat Buchanan]], Tom Pauken, Rev. Tom Euteneuer, [[Michael Steele]], [[J.D. Hayworth]], [[Steve Lonegan]] and [[Tom Coburn]]; [[Sharron Angle]] was rarely on Fox News, far less than [[John McCain]] was, even though Angle's race was far more important than McCain's.</ref> and downplays the social issues (for example, see: [[Fox News and homosexuality]])
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |17
| |
| − | |''[[Christian Science Monitor]]''
| |
| − | |refreshing in its lack of [[lamestream media]] liberal bias
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |18
| |
| − | |''[[USA Today]]''
| |
| − | |better than the [[lamestream media]] in its reporting on state-by-state news, and its greater balance; but it has been very [[feminist]] and one-sided in its reporting on [[Title IX]] in college sports; also may be more anti-[[Catholic]] than other liberal sources
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |19
| |
| − | |''Orange County Register''
| |
| − | |the newspaper for the region that once propelled [[Ronald Reagan]] to become the governor of [[California]], and then the [[President]] of the [[United States]]
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |20
| |
| − | |''Financial Times''
| |
| − | |more conservative than the [[Wall Street Journal]]
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |21
| |
| − | |''Voice of America''
| |
| − | |worth reading from time to time
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |22
| |
| − | |[http://www.examiner.com/creationism-in-national/terry-hurlbut Terry Hurlbut]
| |
| − | |CP administrator Terry Hurlbut at the Examiner
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |23
| |
| − | |[http://www.prolifeblogs.com/ Pro-life blogs]
| |
| − | |a good compendium of blogging on the pro-life issue
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |24
| |
| − | |[http://1461days.blogspot.com/ the 1461]
| |
| − | |following the Obama Administrations use and Abuse of the Executive Order and more
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |25
| |
| − | |Junkscience
| |
| − | |exposing the [[global warming]] hoax and other liberal falsehoods masquerading as science
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |26
| |
| − | |[http://www.miamiherald.com/ Miami Herald]
| |
| − | |Not as [[liberal]] as most American newspapers, and a good source of Latin American news.
| |
| − | |-}
| |
| | | | |
| | == See also == | | == See also == |