| Line 2: |
Line 2: |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | + | {| class="wikitable" |
| | + | |- |
| | + | !Rank |
| | + | !Information Source |
| | + | !Comments |
| | + | |- |
| | + | |1 |
| | + | |[http://www.thegatewaypundit.com GatewayPundit] |
| | + | |Tremendous writing, with a rapier wit, and the national leader in breaking honest news on big stories like the events in Ferguson, Missouri |
| | + | |- |
| | + | |2 |
| | + | |[http://www.cnsnews.com/home Cybercast News] |
| | + | |uniquely informative news across all issues, including social ones; a top-quality news site in every respect |
| | + | |- |
| | + | |3 |
| | + | |[http://patriotupdate.com Patriot Update] |
| | + | |Founded in 2009, [[Patriot Update]] is a leading [[conservative]] news source for the everyday American. |
| | + | |- |
| | + | |4 |
| | + | |[http://newsbusters.org/ Newsbusters] |
| | + | |insightful, original, and good across all issues; exposes liberal deceit well |
| | + | |- |
| | + | |5 |
| | + | |[http://www.lifesitenews.com/ LifeSiteNews] |
| | + | |terrific focus on [[pro-life]] and other moral issues; savvy and original ... and doesn't suffer fools lightly |
| | + | |- |
| | + | |6 |
| | + | |[http://www.conservativenewsandviews.com Conservative News and Views] |
| | + | |relatively new, covers a variety of conservative issues but mostly politics |
| | + | |- |
| | + | |7 |
| | + | |[http://www.breitbart.com/ Breitbart] |
| | + | |breaks some big stories and exposes [[liberal deceit]], and getting better on social issues |
| | + | |- |
| | + | |8 |
| | + | |''The Hill'' |
| | + | |terrific source of news from Washington, D.C., without [[liberal bias]] |
| | + | |- |
| | + | |9 |
| | + | |[http://www.onenewsnow.com OneNewsNow] |
| | + | |a division of the American Family News Network, reporting on general news with liberal selection bias |
| | + | |- |
| | + | |10 |
| | + | |[http://www.lifenews.com/ Lifenews] |
| | + | |has lots of [[abortion]]-related stories, and prioritizes them well, but is not critical enough of politicians who pretend to be pro-life |
| | + | |- |
| | + | |11 |
| | + | |[http://hotair.com/ Hotair] |
| | + | |typically links to other stories, often with a [[neoconservative]] emphasis rather than socially conservative |
| | + | |- |
| | + | |12 |
| | + | |''[[Washington Times]]'' |
| | + | |a conservative news source from the nation's capital |
| | + | |- |
| | + | |13 |
| | + | |[http://www.wnd.com/ WorldNetDaily] |
| | + | |good on some issues, but allowed a column that savaged Todd Akin |
| | + | |- |
| | + | |14 |
| | + | |[http://www.redstate.com/ RedState] |
| | + | |unhelpful or worse on social issues, such as piling on against Todd Akin amid the [[media bullying]] |
| | + | |- |
| | + | |15 |
| | + | |''[http://www.politico.com Politico]'' |
| | + | |left-leaning but a good source of information from a liberal perspective |
| | + | |- |
| | + | |16 |
| | + | |''[[Fox News]]'' |
| | + | |high volume of info, but censors many [[conservative]]s<ref>Conservatives censored (or subjected to hostile interviews) by Fox News include [[Newt Gingrich]] (after Fox News decided to back Mitt Romney), [[Ron Paul]], [[Pat Buchanan]], Tom Pauken, Rev. Tom Euteneuer, [[Michael Steele]], [[J.D. Hayworth]], [[Steve Lonegan]] and [[Tom Coburn]]; [[Sharron Angle]] was rarely on Fox News, far less than [[John McCain]] was, even though Angle's race was far more important than McCain's.</ref> and downplays the social issues (for example, see: [[Fox News and homosexuality]]) |
| | + | |- |
| | + | |17 |
| | + | |''[[Christian Science Monitor]]'' |
| | + | |refreshing in its lack of [[lamestream media]] liberal bias |
| | + | |- |
| | + | |18 |
| | + | |''[[USA Today]]'' |
| | + | |better than the [[lamestream media]] in its reporting on state-by-state news, and its greater balance; but it has been very [[feminist]] and one-sided in its reporting on [[Title IX]] in college sports; also may be more anti-[[Catholic]] than other liberal sources |
| | + | |- |
| | + | |19 |
| | + | |''Orange County Register'' |
| | + | |the newspaper for the region that once propelled [[Ronald Reagan]] to become the governor of [[California]], and then the [[President]] of the [[United States]] |
| | + | |- |
| | + | |20 |
| | + | |''Financial Times'' |
| | + | |more conservative than the [[Wall Street Journal]] |
| | + | |- |
| | + | |21 |
| | + | |''Voice of America'' |
| | + | |worth reading from time to time |
| | + | |- |
| | + | |22 |
| | + | |[http://www.examiner.com/creationism-in-national/terry-hurlbut Terry Hurlbut] |
| | + | |CP administrator Terry Hurlbut at the Examiner |
| | + | |- |
| | + | |23 |
| | + | |[http://www.prolifeblogs.com/ Pro-life blogs] |
| | + | |a good compendium of blogging on the pro-life issue |
| | + | |- |
| | + | |24 |
| | + | |[http://1461days.blogspot.com/ the 1461] |
| | + | |following the Obama Administrations use and Abuse of the Executive Order and more |
| | + | |- |
| | + | |25 |
| | + | |Junkscience |
| | + | |exposing the [[global warming]] hoax and other liberal falsehoods masquerading as science |
| | + | |-} |
| | == See also == | | == See also == |
| | | | |