| | :I'm not sure that the blog is sourcing anti-Christian material, really. Its sources are Eades Home Ministry, Charles Jennings, John Ashcroft, Frank Warren Coburn, Rev. Clark, and Sir Richard Sutton. It might use anti-Christian material on other pages, I'm not sure. But regardless, it seems like if we're going to make a quote, we should support it. It seems like there's this tendency all over these days to find stuff that already agrees with us, and then just use it, not worrying about whether its true or not. But I know you're on Conservapedia because you worry about the truth, and you worry about what's real or not; that seems like it is, or should be, at least, the mission of Conservapedia, and it weakens the project, I think, when we allow ourselves to become to credulous, or when we shade the truth to fit our biases. That's not why I'm here, and I'm pretty sure it's not why you're here either.--[[User:Whizkid|Whizkid]] ([[User talk:Whizkid|talk]]) 00:12, 20 July 2016 (EDT) | | :I'm not sure that the blog is sourcing anti-Christian material, really. Its sources are Eades Home Ministry, Charles Jennings, John Ashcroft, Frank Warren Coburn, Rev. Clark, and Sir Richard Sutton. It might use anti-Christian material on other pages, I'm not sure. But regardless, it seems like if we're going to make a quote, we should support it. It seems like there's this tendency all over these days to find stuff that already agrees with us, and then just use it, not worrying about whether its true or not. But I know you're on Conservapedia because you worry about the truth, and you worry about what's real or not; that seems like it is, or should be, at least, the mission of Conservapedia, and it weakens the project, I think, when we allow ourselves to become to credulous, or when we shade the truth to fit our biases. That's not why I'm here, and I'm pretty sure it's not why you're here either.--[[User:Whizkid|Whizkid]] ([[User talk:Whizkid|talk]]) 00:12, 20 July 2016 (EDT) |