Changed "force of God" to "Holy Spirit" so it conforms to traditional, non-heretical Christianity
Line 890:
Line 890:
|<span id="4:1">1</span>
|<span id="4:1">1</span>
|And Jesus being full of the Holy Ghost returned from Jordan, and was led by the Spirit into the wilderness,
|And Jesus being full of the Holy Ghost returned from Jordan, and was led by the Spirit into the wilderness,
−
|Filled with the force of God, Jesus returned from Jordan and was led by God's Spirit into the desert,
+
|Filled with the Holy Spirit, Jesus returned from the Jordan and was led by God's Spirit into the desert,
−
|use "force of God" for "Holy Ghost" here? "Desert" rather than "wilderness"? Though using "force of God" first and then "God'S Spirit" as translations for the same word (πνεῦμα) is quite confusing..
+
|use "force of God" for "Holy Ghost" here? "Desert" rather than "wilderness"? Though using "force of God" first and then "God'S Spirit" as translations for the same word (πνεῦμα) is quite confusing..And flat-out wrong. The Holy Spirit is not a force. Any doctrinally sound branch of Christianity would regard that description as heresy. The Holy Spirit is a divine person, the third person of the Trinity.
Why is "God's Spirit" capitalized, but "force of God" not - it's the same entity. That adds to the confusion.
Why is "God's Spirit" capitalized, but "force of God" not - it's the same entity. That adds to the confusion.
+
+
"The Jordan" is appropriate here, not "Jordan," since Jesus was returning from the Jordan River.