| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | '''Homo-fascism''' is the term coined by pro-family activists and describing the phenomenon when homosexual activists strive for advancing themselves beyond favored status to supremacy. In line with instructions in ''[[After the Ball]]'' (the [[LGBT]]I equivalent to ''[[Mein Kampf]]'' and the ''[[Communist Manifesto]]''), the homosexual movement avoids using such terms as "favored status" or "supremacy", but rather outwardly pretend their goal is "[[Moral_relativism#Moral_relativism_as_TUMOR|tolerance]]" or "acceptance". Supremacy is then the stage in which the homosexual movement and its allies take effective control of most or all of the centers of power of a [[government]] or other [[organization]]. When they have achieved this level of control they use and abuse their power to suppress and/or punish those who openly disapprove of the [[ABC_Theory_of_Emotion#Homosexual_Lifestyle|homosexual lifestyle]] or [[homosexual agenda|its agenda]].<ref name="Lively2009">{{cite book |title=Redeeming the Rainbow: A Christian Response to the "Gay" Agenda |author=[[Scott Lively]] |publisher=Veritas Aeterna Press |place=Springfield, MA |year=2009 |edition=1 (Version 1.1)|pages=24, 64, 72, 103 |url=http://www.massresistance.org/docs/gen/09b/Redeeming_rainbow}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Homo-fascism – Intimidation by Gay Lobby |author=Peter LaBarbera |publisher=AFTAH, Americans for Truth |date=14 Aug 2015 |url=http://americansfortruth.com/issues/homo-fascism-intimidation-by-gay-lobby/ |quote=Victim of Homo-Fascism: Lakewood, CO baker Jack Phillips has lost 40 percent of his business after closing down the wedding cake part of his business so as not to be forced to make a cake celebrating a homosexual-sin-based “wedding.” To read an in-depth 2014 article documenting the battle between freedom of conscience and homosexual “rights,” go HERE. |accessdate=05 Feb 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=What are the "Useful Idiots" in the Media Afraid of? (Warning: Content May Be Offensive) |publisher=The Sons of Liberty |date=29 Mar 2012 |url=https://youtu.be/xaSQpEA8e8k |accessdate=2 Apr 2017}}</ref> | + | '''Homo-fascism''' is the term coined by pro-family activists and describing the phenomenon when homosexual activists strive for advancing themselves beyond favored status to supremacy. In line with instructions in ''[[After the Ball]]'' (the [[LGBT]]I equivalent to ''[[Mein Kampf]]'' and the ''[[Communist Manifesto]]''), the homosexual movement avoids using such terms as "favored status" or "supremacy", but rather outwardly pretend their goal is "[[Moral relativism#Moral relativism as TUMOR|tolerance]]" or "acceptance". Supremacy is then the stage in which the homosexual movement and its allies take effective control of most or all of the centers of power of a [[government]] or other [[organization]]. When they have achieved this level of control they use and abuse their power to suppress and/or punish those who openly disapprove of the [[ABC Theory of Emotion#Homosexual Lifestyle|homosexual lifestyle]] or [[homosexual agenda|its agenda]].<ref name="Lively2009">{{cite book |title=Redeeming the Rainbow: A Christian Response to the "Gay" Agenda |author=[[Scott Lively]] |publisher=Veritas Aeterna Press |place=Springfield, MA |year=2009 |edition=1 (Version 1.1)|pages=24, 64, 72, 103 |url=http://www.massresistance.org/docs/gen/09b/Redeeming_rainbow}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Homo-fascism – Intimidation by Gay Lobby |author=Peter LaBarbera |publisher=AFTAH, Americans for Truth |date=14 Aug 2015 |url=http://americansfortruth.com/issues/homo-fascism-intimidation-by-gay-lobby/ |quote=Victim of Homo-Fascism: Lakewood, CO baker Jack Phillips has lost 40 percent of his business after closing down the wedding cake part of his business so as not to be forced to make a cake celebrating a homosexual-sin-based “wedding.” To read an in-depth 2014 article documenting the battle between freedom of conscience and homosexual “rights,” go HERE. |accessdate=05 Feb 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=What are the "Useful Idiots" in the Media Afraid of? (Warning: Content May Be Offensive) |publisher=The Sons of Liberty |date=29 Mar 2012 |url=https://youtu.be/xaSQpEA8e8k |accessdate=2 Apr 2017}}</ref> |
| | | | |
| | {| class="wikitable" | | {| class="wikitable" |
| Line 6: |
Line 6: |
| | |- | | |- |
| | |One of the first to use the term ''homo-fascism'' is Pastor Ralph Ovadal of Wisconsin, who defines it as follows: | | |One of the first to use the term ''homo-fascism'' is Pastor Ralph Ovadal of Wisconsin, who defines it as follows: |
| − | ''“[[Fascism]] is a political system whereby all opposition to and dissent from the government is disallowed and crushed. Fascism is a philosophy which tolerates <b>no deviation from an established norm</b>, that being the dictates of a [[interest group|powerful elite]]. Fascism is opposed to the eternal, unchanging, objective law of God and is <b>based on the subjective desires and goals of those who have the power to crush their opposition</b>. In many Western nations, a form of fascism has taken root and presents a clear, present, and growing danger to [[Christian]] [[liberty]] and the [[Church]] of [[Jesus Christ]]. This force for [[evil]] may justly be referred to as “<b>homo-fascism</b>” due to the fact that <b>those espousing and driving it have as their goal to demonize, marginalize, and silence any criticism of or opposition to [[homosexual act]]s and the sodomite agenda</b>. Already Christians in many countries are being arrested for preaching what the [[Bible]] teaches concerning homosexual acts. The machinery of [[tyranny]] is being put into place.”'' | + | ''“[[Fascism]] is a political system whereby all opposition to and dissent from the government is disallowed and crushed. Fascism is a philosophy which tolerates '''no deviation from an established norm''', that being the dictates of a [[interest group|powerful elite]]. Fascism is opposed to the eternal, unchanging, objective law of God and is '''based on the subjective desires and goals of those who have the power to crush their opposition'''. In many Western nations, a form of fascism has taken root and presents a clear, present, and growing danger to [[Christian]] [[liberty]] and the [[Church]] of [[Jesus Christ]]. This force for [[evil]] may justly be referred to as “'''homo-fascism'''” due to the fact that '''those espousing and driving it have as their goal to demonize, marginalize, and silence any criticism of or opposition to [[homosexual act]]s and the sodomite agenda'''. Already Christians in many countries are being arrested for preaching what the [[Bible]] teaches concerning homosexual acts. The machinery of [[tyranny]] is being put into place.”'' |
| | |} | | |} |
| | | | |
| Line 13: |
Line 13: |
| | ! style="font-size:120%; background:violet; text-align:center; padding:5px 0;" | The first step in a homosexual takeover of corporation completed - Example | | ! style="font-size:120%; background:violet; text-align:center; padding:5px 0;" | The first step in a homosexual takeover of corporation completed - Example |
| | |- | | |- |
| − | | style="padding:15px;" |“[[IBM]] is committed to creating a [[Diversity|diverse environment]] and is proud to be an [[Equality|equal opportunity]] employer. All qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, gender, <b>[[gender identity]] or expression, [[sexual orientation]]</b>, national origin, genetics, disability, age, or veteran status. | + | | style="padding:15px;" |“[[IBM]] is committed to creating a [[Diversity|diverse environment]] and is proud to be an [[Equality|equal opportunity]] employer. All qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, gender, '''[[gender identity]] or expression, [[sexual orientation]]''', national origin, genetics, disability, age, or veteran status. |
| | ”<div style="padding-left:40px;">— [[IBM]] [[Corporation]] after [[LGBT]] [[gleichschaltung]]<ref>{{cite web |title=IBM IS NOW HIRING Client Experience Advisor |url=http://www.profesia.sk/praca/ibm/O2902763 |accessdate=07 Feb 2017 |quote=Job Description, Requirements, Additional information}}</ref></div> | | ”<div style="padding-left:40px;">— [[IBM]] [[Corporation]] after [[LGBT]] [[gleichschaltung]]<ref>{{cite web |title=IBM IS NOW HIRING Client Experience Advisor |url=http://www.profesia.sk/praca/ibm/O2902763 |accessdate=07 Feb 2017 |quote=Job Description, Requirements, Additional information}}</ref></div> |
| | |} | | |} |
| Line 24: |
Line 24: |
| | Exploitation of community organizations often involves a public relations ploy that can be called "''bundling''". Bundling is the homosexual activists’ tactic of wrapping themselves in the cloak of "[[civil rights]]" by sponsoring coalitions of minorities and including themselves as a member minority. Their purpose is to advance the idea that "''sexual orientation''" is a genuine basis for minority status by bundling it together with [[race]], [[ethnicity]], [[gender]], etc. Importantly, the homosexuals almost always place racial minorities as the figureheads of these coalitions to create the impression that their primary interest is the advancement of the legitimate minorities. This is not a difficult proposition, since there are some homosexuals who are also racial minorities. The optimum scenario for the homosexual is a coalition headed by an in-the-closet homosexual of a minority race who can pretend neutrality when promoting a homosexual goal. | | Exploitation of community organizations often involves a public relations ploy that can be called "''bundling''". Bundling is the homosexual activists’ tactic of wrapping themselves in the cloak of "[[civil rights]]" by sponsoring coalitions of minorities and including themselves as a member minority. Their purpose is to advance the idea that "''sexual orientation''" is a genuine basis for minority status by bundling it together with [[race]], [[ethnicity]], [[gender]], etc. Importantly, the homosexuals almost always place racial minorities as the figureheads of these coalitions to create the impression that their primary interest is the advancement of the legitimate minorities. This is not a difficult proposition, since there are some homosexuals who are also racial minorities. The optimum scenario for the homosexual is a coalition headed by an in-the-closet homosexual of a minority race who can pretend neutrality when promoting a homosexual goal. |
| | | | |
| − | Most important to homosexual strategy in all of these tactics is to hold the key positions and then to directly or indirectly use the power of those positions to change the society, by marketing the homosexual message to the public<ref>{{cite web |title=Dúhový pochod v Bratislave (Rainbow march in [[Bratislava]]) |publisher=Západoslovenská televízia |date=05 Jul 2014 |url=https://youtu.be/0iWM1m9jKxQ?t=155 |quote=video shows IBM and DELL "LGBTI minority" - "a part of all other 'diversity' groups" - supporting the "GAY PRIDE" in Bratislava, Slovakia |language=Slovak |accessdate=06 Mar 2017 }}</ref> while also attacking and marginalizing the pro-family leaders and organizations, for example, by introducing so called Anti-award 'The [[homophobia|homophobe]] of the Year'.<ref>{{cite web |title=Anton Chromík: Kým Peter Weisenbacher neodovzdá cenu víťazovi minulého roka, nemal by robiť ďalší ročník! (If Peter Weisenbacher [LGBT Activist] does not hand over the Award to the vinner from the last year, he should forget starting the new one)|publisher=hlavnespravy.sk |date=18 Aug 2016 |url=http://www.hlavnespravy.sk/anton-chromik-kym-peter-weisenbacher-neodovzda-cenu-vitazovi-minuleho-roka-nemal-by-robit-dalsi-rocnik/821257 |accessdate=21 Feb 2017 |language=Slovak |quote=Cena Homofób roka mi každý rok pripomína, že Slovenská republika je vo vzťahu k úcte k ľuďom s homosexuálnym cítením na tom dobre a ja som tomu veľmi rád. Mnohé nominované výroky za posledné roky (napr. nominovaní poslanci za novelu Ústavy o manželstve muža a ženy) a aj môj výherný výrok za rok 2015 to jasne dokazujú. Verím, že autori by nominovali skutočné výroky nenávisti, ak by existovali. V tejto súťaži zrejme nezáleží na obsahu výrokov, ale skôr na tom, že sa hlasovaním dá prejaviť nenávisť voči konkrétnej osobe s iným názorom. Skutočné informovanie o konkrétnych prípadoch nenávisti voči homosexuálne cítiacim absentuje. | + | Most important to homosexual strategy in all of these tactics is to hold the key positions and then to directly or indirectly use the power of those positions to change the society, by marketing the homosexual message to the public<ref>{{cite web |title=Dúhový pochod v Bratislave (Rainbow march in [[Bratislava]]) |publisher=Západoslovenská televízia |date=05 Jul 2014 |url=https://youtu.be/0iWM1m9jKxQ?t=155 |quote=video shows IBM and DELL "LGBTI minority" - "a part of all other 'diversity' groups" - supporting the "GAY PRIDE" in Bratislava, Slovakia |language=Slovak |accessdate=06 Mar 2017 }}</ref> while also attacking and marginalizing the pro-family leaders and organizations, for example, by introducing so called Anti-award 'The [[homophobia|homophobe]] of the Year'.<ref>{{cite web |title=Anton Chromík: Kým Peter Weisenbacher neodovzdá cenu víťazovi minulého roka, nemal by robiť ďalší ročník! (If Peter Weisenbacher [LGBT Activist] does not hand over the Award to the vinner from the last year, he should forget starting the new one)|publisher=hlavnespravy.sk |date=18 Aug 2016 |url=http://www.hlavnespravy.sk/anton-chromik-kym-peter-weisenbacher-neodovzda-cenu-vitazovi-minuleho-roka-nemal-by-robit-dalsi-rocnik/821257 |accessdate=21 Feb 2017 |language=Slovak |quote=Cena Homofób roka mi každý rok pripomína, že Slovenská republika je vo vzťahu k úcte k ľuďom s homosexuálnym cítením na tom dobre a ja som tomu veľmi rád. Mnohé nominované výroky za posledné roky (napr. nominovaní poslanci za novelu Ústavy o manželstve muža a ženy) a aj môj výherný výrok za rok 2015 to jasne dokazujú. Verím, že autori by nominovali skutočné výroky nenávisti, ak by existovali. V tejto súťaži zrejme nezáleží na obsahu výrokov, ale skôr na tom, že sa hlasovaním dá prejaviť nenávisť voči konkrétnej osobe s iným názorom. Skutočné informovanie o konkrétnych prípadoch nenávisti voči homosexuálne cítiacim absentuje. Aj vďaka takejto súťaži nadobudol pojem homofób skôr význam zástancu manželstva a rodiny muža a ženy. Aj preto som minulý rok zverejnil tlačovú správu, že cenu Homofób roka si rád preberiem verejne na námestí „ešte” Slobody v Bratislave. Aké bolo moje prekvapenie, keď včera Denník SME a portál Aktuality.sk zverejnil, že cenu som si odmietol prevziať. Toto nie je pravda a tým som bol obvinený zo lži. Organizátori súťaže sa zaviazali, že sa cenu pokúsia doručiť, ale nič také neudialo. Viackrát som sa odovzdania ceny domáhal, o čom svedčia aj moje viacnásobné požiadavky v mailovej komunikácii s Inštitútom Petra Weisenbachera. Predložím ich na požiadanie k dispozícii médiám. Žiadam, aby sa mi verejne Peter Weisenbacher a Inštitút ľudských práv ospravedlnil za lož, ktorú o mne zrejme on uviedol v tlačovej správe a aby nabral odvahu namiesto lži mi cenu skutočne odovzdať. Anton Chromík, predseda Aliancia za rodinu. TRANSLATION INTO ENGLISH: The Anti-Award ‘Homphobe of the Year’ reminds me year by year that Slovakia is doing well when it comes to respecting people suffering from same-sex attractions and I’m very pleased about it. Many nominated quotes in recent years (e.g. Nomination of MPs for their passing the amendment to the Constitution on definition of marriage as union between one man and one woman) and also my winning statement in 2015 are clear evidence of this. I believe that authors of contest would nominate real examples of hate speech, if such existed. Obviously, what matters in this award competition is an effort to bully concrete persons who differ in their opinion with organizers, rather than focusing on the meaning of actual quotes. The real information on specific cases of hate speech towards people with same-sex attractions is completely absent. Also owing to this competition, the term ‘homophobe’ became rather a label for defender of marriage and family consisting of man and woman. That's why last year I published a press release informing that I’m ready to publicly receive the Anti-Award ‘Homphobe of the Year’ at the square, so far still of Freedom, in Bratislava. However, I was absolutely taken aback when the mainstream newspaper SME and the internet portal Aktuality.sk published the misinformation asserting that I allegedly refused to receive the accolade. This is not true whatsoever and thus I was accused of lying. The organizers of award-contest have committed themselves to try to deliver the prize to the winner, but nothing like that happened. More than once, I have sought to get the award handed over, as can be proved by my multiple requests in the e-mail communication with the LGBT Institute of human rights run by Peter Weisenbacher. They are available on request to the media. I demand that Peter Weisenbacher and the Institute of human rights should apologize in public for the lie about me that they evidently stated in the press release for the media; and pull up the courage to arrange for the real award-delivery instead of spreading lies. Anton Chromík, president of Coalition for family (in Slovak: Aliancia za rodinu)}}</ref> |
| − | Aj vďaka takejto súťaži nadobudol pojem homofób skôr význam zástancu manželstva a rodiny muža a ženy. Aj preto som minulý rok zverejnil tlačovú správu, že cenu Homofób roka si rád preberiem verejne na námestí „ešte” Slobody v Bratislave. | |
| − | Aké bolo moje prekvapenie, keď včera Denník SME a portál Aktuality.sk zverejnil, že cenu som si odmietol prevziať. Toto nie je pravda a tým som bol obvinený zo lži. Organizátori súťaže sa zaviazali, že sa cenu pokúsia doručiť, ale nič také neudialo. | |
| − | Viackrát som sa odovzdania ceny domáhal, o čom svedčia aj moje viacnásobné požiadavky v mailovej komunikácii s Inštitútom Petra Weisenbachera. Predložím ich na požiadanie k dispozícii médiám. | |
| − | Žiadam, aby sa mi verejne Peter Weisenbacher a Inštitút ľudských práv ospravedlnil za lož, ktorú o mne zrejme on uviedol v tlačovej správe a aby nabral odvahu namiesto lži mi cenu skutočne odovzdať. | |
| − | Anton Chromík, predseda Aliancia za rodinu. | |
| − | TRANSLATION INTO ENGLISH: | |
| − | The Anti-Award ‘Homphobe of the Year’ reminds me year by year that Slovakia is doing well when it comes to respecting people suffering from same-sex attractions and I’m very pleased about it. | |
| − | Many nominated quotes in recent years (e.g. Nomination of MPs for their passing the amendment to the Constitution on definition of marriage as union between one man and one woman) and also my winning statement in 2015 are clear evidence of this. I believe that authors of contest would nominate real examples of hate speech, if such existed. Obviously, what matters in this award competition is an effort to bully concrete persons who differ in their opinion with organizers, rather than focusing on the meaning of actual quotes. The real information on specific cases of hate speech towards people with same-sex attractions is completely absent. Also owing to this competition, the term ‘homophobe’ became rather a label for defender of marriage and family consisting of man and woman. That's why last year I published a press release informing that I’m ready to publicly receive the Anti-Award ‘Homphobe of the Year’ at the square, so far still of Freedom, in Bratislava. However, I was absolutely taken aback when the mainstream newspaper SME and the internet portal Aktuality.sk published the misinformation asserting that I allegedly refused to receive the accolade. This is not true whatsoever and thus I was accused of lying. The organizers of award-contest have committed themselves to try to deliver the prize to the winner, but nothing like that happened. More than once, I have sought to get the award handed over, as can be proved by my multiple requests in the e-mail communication with the LGBT Institute of human rights run by Peter Weisenbacher. They are available on request to the media. I demand that Peter Weisenbacher and the Institute of human rights should apologize in public for the lie about me that they evidently stated in the press release for the media; and pull up the courage to arrange for the real award-delivery instead of spreading lies. | |
| − | Anton Chromík, president of Coalition for family (in Slovak: Aliancia za rodinu)}}</ref> | |
| | | | |
| | ===Consolidation of homosexual power through psychological coercion tactics=== | | ===Consolidation of homosexual power through psychological coercion tactics=== |
| Line 39: |
Line 30: |
| | | | |
| | ===Diverting Company Resources into homosexual political agenda=== | | ===Diverting Company Resources into homosexual political agenda=== |
| − | Once the control group has consolidated power, the organization is plundered for its available resources. These include tangible resources such as money and property, but also intangibles such as advertising and vendor contracts and even community goodwill. Charitable giving, too, is exploited, as gifts and grants are diverted away from previously-favored beneficiaries like the Boy Scouts or [[Saint_Patrick#Saint_Patrick.27s_Day|St. Patrick's Day]] Parades<ref>{{cite web |title=Concerns, Confusion Over ‘LGBT’ Group in St. Patrick’s Parade |author=Kevin Jones/CNA |publisher=National Catholic Register |date=5 Sep 2014 |url=http://www.ncregister.com/daily-news/concerns-confusion-over-lgbt-group-in-st.-patricks-parade |accessdate=05 Feb 2017 |quote=NEW YORK — A spokesman for the New York City St. Patrick’s Day Parade said this week’s announcement of the inclusion of an LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered) activist group in the traditionally Catholic parade was a “gesture of goodwill.” ... “One would hope that all the new entries will conduct themselves in a manner that honors St. Patrick, lest another round of controversy emerges” ...“Now, the pro-abortion groups and the radical gay groups want in as well.” ... <b>Target of Homosexual Activists</b>. Parade organizers’ refusal to approve applications from LGBT advocacy groups made the parade the target of lawsuits, critical media coverage and corporate boycotts. The St. Patrick’s Day Parade website said that, in the early 1990s, the parade was “attacked for its traditional values” but noted that organizers’ rights were “upheld all the way to the Supreme Court.”...“Anyone is free to apply, any group can be free to apply, but for an abortion group to apply to march in a Catholic parade would be a great anomaly, to say the least.”...Donohue blamed “<b>corporate pressure</b>” from NBC and others, including Wall Street companies and Guinness. The Ireland-based brewer pulled its sponsorship from the parade this year because of the policy on the participation of homosexual groups.}}</ref> to homosexual-controlled organizations<ref>{{cite web |title=Obama Champions Gay Task Force’s ‘Creating Change’ Conference – Which Promotes ‘Kinky Sex’ (Sadomasochism) and Multi-Partner Unions; Event Funded by Southwest Airlines, Office Depot, [[AARP]] and Wells Fargo |publisher=Americans for Truth |year=2013 |url=http://americansfortruth.com/2013/01/25/breaking-obama-champions-gay-task-force-creating-change-conference-which-promotes-sadomasochism-multi-partner-unions/ |accessdate=09 Feb 2017 |quote=This year’s annual “Creating Change” conference sponsored by the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force (NGLTF) — with major <b>corporate sponsors</b> like Southwest Airlines, Wells Fargo and Office Depot – is again celebrating sadomasochism, “polyamory” (multiple-partner sexual unions) and other deviant perversions on the sexual and gender fringe.}}</ref> spreading [[LGBT]]I [[demagogue]]ry.<ref>{{cite web |title=Modern Romance: Love, Marriage & Monogamy |author=Dan Savage & Esther Perel |publisher=Talks at Google |url=https://youtu.be/s7E9ASb3LfE?t=365 | + | Once the control group has consolidated power, the organization is plundered for its available resources. These include tangible resources such as money and property, but also intangibles such as advertising and vendor contracts and even community goodwill. Charitable giving, too, is exploited, as gifts and grants are diverted away from previously-favored beneficiaries like the Boy Scouts or [[Saint Patrick#Saint Patrick.27s Day|St. Patrick's Day]] Parades<ref>{{cite web |title=Concerns, Confusion Over ‘LGBT’ Group in St. Patrick’s Parade |author=Kevin Jones/CNA |publisher=National Catholic Register |date=5 Sep 2014 |url=http://www.ncregister.com/daily-news/concerns-confusion-over-lgbt-group-in-st.-patricks-parade |accessdate=05 Feb 2017 |quote=NEW YORK — A spokesman for the New York City St. Patrick’s Day Parade said this week’s announcement of the inclusion of an LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered) activist group in the traditionally Catholic parade was a “gesture of goodwill.” ... “One would hope that all the new entries will conduct themselves in a manner that honors St. Patrick, lest another round of controversy emerges” ...“Now, the pro-abortion groups and the radical gay groups want in as well.” ... '''Target of Homosexual Activists'''. Parade organizers’ refusal to approve applications from LGBT advocacy groups made the parade the target of lawsuits, critical media coverage and corporate boycotts. The St. Patrick’s Day Parade website said that, in the early 1990s, the parade was “attacked for its traditional values” but noted that organizers’ rights were “upheld all the way to the Supreme Court.”...“Anyone is free to apply, any group can be free to apply, but for an abortion group to apply to march in a Catholic parade would be a great anomaly, to say the least.”...Donohue blamed “'''corporate pressure'''” from NBC and others, including Wall Street companies and Guinness. The Ireland-based brewer pulled its sponsorship from the parade this year because of the policy on the participation of homosexual groups.}}</ref> to homosexual-controlled organizations<ref>{{cite web |title=Obama Champions Gay Task Force’s ‘Creating Change’ Conference – Which Promotes ‘Kinky Sex’ (Sadomasochism) and Multi-Partner Unions; Event Funded by Southwest Airlines, Office Depot, [[AARP]] and Wells Fargo |publisher=Americans for Truth |year=2013 |url=http://americansfortruth.com/2013/01/25/breaking-obama-champions-gay-task-force-creating-change-conference-which-promotes-sadomasochism-multi-partner-unions/ |accessdate=09 Feb 2017 |quote=This year’s annual “Creating Change” conference sponsored by the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force (NGLTF) — with major '''corporate sponsors''' like Southwest Airlines, Wells Fargo and Office Depot – is again celebrating sadomasochism, “polyamory” (multiple-partner sexual unions) and other deviant perversions on the sexual and gender fringe.}}</ref> spreading [[LGBT]]I [[demagogue]]ry.<ref>{{cite web |title=Modern Romance: Love, Marriage & Monogamy |author=Dan Savage & Esther Perel |publisher=Talks at Google |url=https://youtu.be/s7E9ASb3LfE?t=365 |
| | |date=22 Jan 2016|quote=Moderated by Logan Ury; “We have to stop telling people that monogamy is only thing that you have to execute perfectly 100% of time to be regarded as good at it. … We need to tell people that if you were with somebody for – really, now, because of expanding lifespans, 50, 60 years, if you make a commitment in your early and mid-20s, or late 20s or 30s – if you were with somebody for 60 yrs and they only cheated on you a handful of time, and you only cheated on them a handful of times, you were both pretty good at monogamy, not bad at it. … Most of history monogamy was one person for life, and at this moment, monogamy is one person at a time.” |accessdate=07 Feb 2017}}</ref> While some resources benefit the internal control group (i.e. domestic partnership benefits and employee perks), most are focused strategically outside of the organization to further the homosexual political agenda in the community.<ref name="Lively2009"/><ref>{{cite web |title=Heineken, Sam Adams Withdraw Support From St. Patrick’s Day Parades Over LGBT Discrimination |author= NewNowNext Staff |date=14 Apr 2014 |url=http://www.newnownext.com/heinekin-sam-adams-withdraw-support-from-st-patricks-day-parades-over-lgbt-discrimination/03/2014/ |accessdate=05 Feb 2017 |quote=Heineken has announced it is dropping its sponsorship of the New York City St. Patrick’s Day Parade, which prohibits LGBT groups from participating. ... “By ending support of the New York City St. Patrick’s Day Parade, Heineken sent the right message to LGBT youth, customers and employees, who simply want to be part of the celebration. Other sponsors who support LGBT families should be quick to follow.” ...While LGBT individuals are welcome to participate in either event, both parades ban groups from carrying banners or signs identifying themselves as gay.}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Guinness withdraws from New York St Patrick’s day parade |author=Shannon Bond |publisher=FT |date=17 Mar 2014 |url=https://www.ft.com/content/17bd2290-adcc-11e3-9ddc-00144feab7de|quote=The Irish brewer owned by the UK’s Diageo pulled out of Monday’s parade in New York City, where organisers have said gay and lesbian groups may march but cannot carry signs or identify themselves. “Guinness has a strong history of supporting diversity and being an advocate for equality for all. We were hopeful that the policy of exclusion would be reversed for this year’s parade,” Diageo said. “As this has not come to pass, Guinness has withdrawn its participation. We will continue to work with community leaders to ensure that future parades have an inclusionary policy.” The move by Guinness, a beer brand with origins in Dublin that is considered a historic part of Ireland’s drinking culture, followed decisions by Boston Beer, brewer of Sam Adams, and Heineken to pull out of St Patrick’s day events in Boston and New York. Major marketers from Coca-Cola to General Mills are increasingly emphasising multicultural and diversity efforts in their campaigns as Americans’ support for gay rights, including same-sex marriage, has strengthened sharply in recent years. Honey Maid, Mondelez’s graham cracker brand, recently released a campaign that features interracial and gay couples. A recent promotion for General Motors’ Chevrolet brand also included gay and interracial couples with the tagline: “The new us.” |accessdate=05 Feb 2017}}</ref> | | |date=22 Jan 2016|quote=Moderated by Logan Ury; “We have to stop telling people that monogamy is only thing that you have to execute perfectly 100% of time to be regarded as good at it. … We need to tell people that if you were with somebody for – really, now, because of expanding lifespans, 50, 60 years, if you make a commitment in your early and mid-20s, or late 20s or 30s – if you were with somebody for 60 yrs and they only cheated on you a handful of time, and you only cheated on them a handful of times, you were both pretty good at monogamy, not bad at it. … Most of history monogamy was one person for life, and at this moment, monogamy is one person at a time.” |accessdate=07 Feb 2017}}</ref> While some resources benefit the internal control group (i.e. domestic partnership benefits and employee perks), most are focused strategically outside of the organization to further the homosexual political agenda in the community.<ref name="Lively2009"/><ref>{{cite web |title=Heineken, Sam Adams Withdraw Support From St. Patrick’s Day Parades Over LGBT Discrimination |author= NewNowNext Staff |date=14 Apr 2014 |url=http://www.newnownext.com/heinekin-sam-adams-withdraw-support-from-st-patricks-day-parades-over-lgbt-discrimination/03/2014/ |accessdate=05 Feb 2017 |quote=Heineken has announced it is dropping its sponsorship of the New York City St. Patrick’s Day Parade, which prohibits LGBT groups from participating. ... “By ending support of the New York City St. Patrick’s Day Parade, Heineken sent the right message to LGBT youth, customers and employees, who simply want to be part of the celebration. Other sponsors who support LGBT families should be quick to follow.” ...While LGBT individuals are welcome to participate in either event, both parades ban groups from carrying banners or signs identifying themselves as gay.}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Guinness withdraws from New York St Patrick’s day parade |author=Shannon Bond |publisher=FT |date=17 Mar 2014 |url=https://www.ft.com/content/17bd2290-adcc-11e3-9ddc-00144feab7de|quote=The Irish brewer owned by the UK’s Diageo pulled out of Monday’s parade in New York City, where organisers have said gay and lesbian groups may march but cannot carry signs or identify themselves. “Guinness has a strong history of supporting diversity and being an advocate for equality for all. We were hopeful that the policy of exclusion would be reversed for this year’s parade,” Diageo said. “As this has not come to pass, Guinness has withdrawn its participation. We will continue to work with community leaders to ensure that future parades have an inclusionary policy.” The move by Guinness, a beer brand with origins in Dublin that is considered a historic part of Ireland’s drinking culture, followed decisions by Boston Beer, brewer of Sam Adams, and Heineken to pull out of St Patrick’s day events in Boston and New York. Major marketers from Coca-Cola to General Mills are increasingly emphasising multicultural and diversity efforts in their campaigns as Americans’ support for gay rights, including same-sex marriage, has strengthened sharply in recent years. Honey Maid, Mondelez’s graham cracker brand, recently released a campaign that features interracial and gay couples. A recent promotion for General Motors’ Chevrolet brand also included gay and interracial couples with the tagline: “The new us.” |accessdate=05 Feb 2017}}</ref> |
| | | | |
| Line 58: |
Line 49: |
| | Homo-fascists know that preserving the people’s option to destroy unborn life is essential to maintaining so called "[[sexual freedom]]" as a social "norm". If women lost their choice to legally kill their unborn offspring, the resulting inevitable shift of emphasis from self-gratification to family responsibility in such a large section of the population would change the entire culture. When a woman gives in to fear and selfishness to kill the child in her womb, she will not feel that she can criticize other sinners. The choice to kill their unborn children morally compromises both men and women (making them unwilling to criticize choices to engage in other forms of immoral behavior), and ensures that the outcome of an unwanted child will not be a lasting deterrent to those who have chosen sexual "freedom" over family. This explains why homosexuals, who by definition cannot conceive children together, are among the most militant advocates of [[abortion]] on demand. | | Homo-fascists know that preserving the people’s option to destroy unborn life is essential to maintaining so called "[[sexual freedom]]" as a social "norm". If women lost their choice to legally kill their unborn offspring, the resulting inevitable shift of emphasis from self-gratification to family responsibility in such a large section of the population would change the entire culture. When a woman gives in to fear and selfishness to kill the child in her womb, she will not feel that she can criticize other sinners. The choice to kill their unborn children morally compromises both men and women (making them unwilling to criticize choices to engage in other forms of immoral behavior), and ensures that the outcome of an unwanted child will not be a lasting deterrent to those who have chosen sexual "freedom" over family. This explains why homosexuals, who by definition cannot conceive children together, are among the most militant advocates of [[abortion]] on demand. |
| | | | |
| − | The homosexual movement has many allies in its campaign to promote sexual immorality, but it is the only social movement in the history of the world whose primary purpose is to eliminate social restraints on [[sexual]] conduct.{{#tag:ref|cf. What distinguishes homosexuality (the indulgence of same-sex attraction) from other sins is that some of those who practice it have created a social and political movement to normalize and legitimize it.<ref name="Lively2009"/>|group=note}} It is heavily funded, highly organized and strategically positioned to maximize its ability to change societies and cultures<ref name="Lively2009">{{cite book |title=Redeeming the Rainbow: A Christian Response to the "Gay" Agenda |author=[[Scott Lively]] |publisher=Veritas Aeterna Press |place=Springfield, MA |year=2009 |edition=1 (Version 1.1)|Chapter=1: Pro-family answers to common questions about homosexuality and "gay" agenda |pages= i, 8, 60, 176|url=http://www.massresistance.org/docs/gen/09b/Redeeming_rainbow}}</ref> by means of [[Gleichschaltung#LGBTI_Gleichschaltung|LGBTI gleichschaltung]]. | + | The homosexual movement has many allies in its campaign to promote sexual immorality, but it is the only social movement in the history of the world whose primary purpose is to eliminate social restraints on [[sexual]] conduct.{{#tag:ref|cf. What distinguishes homosexuality (the indulgence of same-sex attraction) from other sins is that some of those who practice it have created a social and political movement to normalize and legitimize it.<ref name="Lively2009"/>|group=note}} It is heavily funded, highly organized and strategically positioned to maximize its ability to change societies and cultures<ref name="Lively2009">{{cite book |title=Redeeming the Rainbow: A Christian Response to the "Gay" Agenda |author=[[Scott Lively]] |publisher=Veritas Aeterna Press |place=Springfield, MA |year=2009 |edition=1 (Version 1.1)|chapter=1: Pro-family answers to common questions about homosexuality and "gay" agenda |pages= i, 8, 60, 176|url=http://www.massresistance.org/docs/gen/09b/Redeeming_rainbow}}</ref> by means of [[Gleichschaltung#LGBTI Gleichschaltung|LGBTI gleichschaltung]]. |
| | | | |
| | ==Notes== | | ==Notes== |
| Line 69: |
Line 60: |
| | *[[After the Ball]] | | *[[After the Ball]] |
| | *[[Gleichschaltung]] | | *[[Gleichschaltung]] |
| − | *[[Anthropological_Revolution#Homosexual_Agenda|Homosexual agenda]] | + | *[[Anthropological Revolution#Homosexual Agenda|Homosexual agenda]] |
| | *[[Militant gays]] | | *[[Militant gays]] |
| − | *[[Rainbow#Liberal_redefinitions|Rainbow: Liberal redefinitions]] | + | *[[Rainbow#Liberal redefinitions|Rainbow: Liberal redefinitions]] |
| | *[[Zapping the shrinks]] | | *[[Zapping the shrinks]] |
| | | | |