Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
1,942
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 8:
Line 8: + + + + +
Undo revision 1343211 by Anglican (talk) and respond to Koi
This page needs a serious cleanup. It reads like a trashy editorial, written by somebody who was offended, and did not take the time to look at it from an encyclopedic point of view. If nobody comes with a suggestion, I will re-write the entire article.[[User:JonM|JonM]] 16:42, 24 December 2011 (EST)
This page needs a serious cleanup. It reads like a trashy editorial, written by somebody who was offended, and did not take the time to look at it from an encyclopedic point of view. If nobody comes with a suggestion, I will re-write the entire article.[[User:JonM|JonM]] 16:42, 24 December 2011 (EST)
:I agree. The article is trash, and needs to be re-written. If help is required, I will dispense it on a semi regular basis. --'''''B.L.''''' 09:12, 13 February 2012 (EST)
:I agree. The article is trash, and needs to be re-written. If help is required, I will dispense it on a semi regular basis. --'''''B.L.''''' 09:12, 13 February 2012 (EST)
== Umm ==
Uncyclopaedia can get a mention but [http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Main_Page my bois] can't? Just thinking out loud. [[User:Koidevelopment|Vive]] [[User talk:Koidevelopment|Liberté!]] 16:47, 15 May 2017 (EDT)
:I suppose not, though RationalWiki is more frequently viewed than uncyclopedia.co. I won't stop you from making an article, but I don't regard either topic as significant enough to deserve an article in a serious encyclopedia. Not that we're the most serious.--[[User:Abcqwe|Abcqwe]] ([[User talk:Abcqwe|talk]]) 16:56, 15 May 2017 (EDT)