SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
3,266
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 13:
Line 13: + + +
reply
Uncyclopaedia can get a mention but [http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Main_Page my bois] can't? Just thinking out loud. [[User:Koidevelopment|Vive]] [[User talk:Koidevelopment|Liberté!]] 16:47, 15 May 2017 (EDT)
Uncyclopaedia can get a mention but [http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Main_Page my bois] can't? Just thinking out loud. [[User:Koidevelopment|Vive]] [[User talk:Koidevelopment|Liberté!]] 16:47, 15 May 2017 (EDT)
:I suppose not, though RationalWiki is more frequently viewed than uncyclopedia.co. I won't stop you from making an article, but I don't regard either topic as significant enough to deserve an article in a serious encyclopedia. Not that we're the most serious.--[[User:Abcqwe|Abcqwe]] ([[User talk:Abcqwe|talk]]) 16:56, 15 May 2017 (EDT)
:I suppose not, though RationalWiki is more frequently viewed than uncyclopedia.co. I won't stop you from making an article, but I don't regard either topic as significant enough to deserve an article in a serious encyclopedia. Not that we're the most serious.--[[User:Abcqwe|Abcqwe]] ([[User talk:Abcqwe|talk]]) 16:56, 15 May 2017 (EDT)
::Abcqwe beat me to it by a few seconds.
::Point of history: RW used to be so seriously hated here that it was in the "spam filter"; it was impossible to enter the name in any article. People used various subterfuges, like a reference somewhere to "the website whose names rhymes with 'national picky'". This prohibition seems to have gotten changed a year or so ago. But it is extremely unlikely that a page about RW will ever be created here. I recommend that you not try.
::By the way, one should never delete a talk page comment unless it is libelous or seriously detrimental. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 18:38, 15 May 2017 (EDT)