Changes

:::::::::::That said, I think a pretty good job of keeping each entry short and to the point has been done.  I wonder if we just have too many points.  At over 11,500 words, this just might be too much.  It's Andy's site, so if he is fine with this length, then that's okay; I'm just concerned that in a word where no one looks at page two of a Google search, we will loose readers before they get to the best points.  I'm not saying we should slash huge amounts of information, but I wonder if there are some less important points which could be trimmed, or even removed now that better content is available.  At the very least, perhaps we should focus more tightly on what Trump has directly done.  For example, the entry under failures of "Due to confirmation delays in the Senate, many leaders of the agencies in charge of border security still had "acting" status well into Trump's presidency, something which prevented agencies from implementing stronger immigration enforcement policies." doesn't really relate to him.  Others are resisting him, but that is not his fault.  he could bow to their demands to get more cooperation, but that is not what he should be doing.

:::::::::::That said, I think a pretty good job of keeping each entry short and to the point has been done.  I wonder if we just have too many points.  At over 11,500 words, this just might be too much.  It's Andy's site, so if he is fine with this length, then that's okay; I'm just concerned that in a word where no one looks at page two of a Google search, we will loose readers before they get to the best points.  I'm not saying we should slash huge amounts of information, but I wonder if there are some less important points which could be trimmed, or even removed now that better content is available.  At the very least, perhaps we should focus more tightly on what Trump has directly done.  For example, the entry under failures of "Due to confirmation delays in the Senate, many leaders of the agencies in charge of border security still had "acting" status well into Trump's presidency, something which prevented agencies from implementing stronger immigration enforcement policies." doesn't really relate to him.  Others are resisting him, but that is not his fault.  he could bow to their demands to get more cooperation, but that is not what he should be doing.

:::::::::::When I was asked before if size was an issue I didn't have much of an opinion, but even skimming through this page takes quite a while! It's good to show all the great things he's done, but maybe we can trip it down a bit, and eliminate anythnig he didn't directly influence.  Any thoughts? --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] ^{([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])} 01:23, 25 June 2017 (EDT)

:::::::::::When I was asked before if size was an issue I didn't have much of an opinion, but even skimming through this page takes quite a while! It's good to show all the great things he's done, but maybe we can trip it down a bit, and eliminate anythnig he didn't directly influence.  Any thoughts? --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] ^{([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])} 01:23, 25 June 2017 (EDT)

== VA to deal with under/unused buildings ==

== VA to deal with under/unused buildings ==