Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, move, oversight, protect, rollback, Administrators
51,035
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 239:
Line 239: + +
Talk:Donald Trump achievements (view source)
Revision as of 07:00, June 25, 2017
, 07:00, June 25, 2017→Border patrol raid --> appropriate to add?
:::::::::::::One last thing, I will be splitting this article by year, with the main page still existing but with a much smaller size and with most of the information being in the sub-articles. It will be like the Bias in Wikipedia series. Some of those sub-articles are very long and hard to read as they are just continuous blocks of words. This one will be a piece of cake by comparison because I actually have article sections and sub-sections. I strongly oppose trimming this article (other than creating sub-articles by year as we already discussed) and think this article not only combats MSM bias but also is not out-of-line with CP standards, at least compared to other high-profile articles. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 02:48, 25 June 2017 (EDT)
:::::::::::::One last thing, I will be splitting this article by year, with the main page still existing but with a much smaller size and with most of the information being in the sub-articles. It will be like the Bias in Wikipedia series. Some of those sub-articles are very long and hard to read as they are just continuous blocks of words. This one will be a piece of cake by comparison because I actually have article sections and sub-sections. I strongly oppose trimming this article (other than creating sub-articles by year as we already discussed) and think this article not only combats MSM bias but also is not out-of-line with CP standards, at least compared to other high-profile articles. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 02:48, 25 June 2017 (EDT)
:::::::::::::@JDano: what I am saying is that since I am the one doing the vast majority of the adding, I am posting disputable achievements to the talk page for input from other editors. I have done that numerous times already. Also, if you do not believe something is an achievement, you can bring it up on the talk page for us to discuss. The article from the beginning has stated in the intro that these achievements help promote conservative ideals/policies. If an achievement does not promote conservative policies (or improve the nation), that is enough. If anything, I will only accept broad criteria like those. Having detailed criteria like you are apparently proposing will do more harm than good and lead to fights over the criteria to use. I think we can all agree here that an achievement helps the nation and promotes conservative values (that's why I listed those proclamations -- unlike the others, those I listed explicitly promote conservative values. Also, I oppose listing the total amount of executive orders, etc., ''as opposed to'' listing some notable executive actions. Barack Obama made many executive actions -- did they do any good?). --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 03:00, 25 June 2017 (EDT)
== VA to deal with under/unused buildings ==
== VA to deal with under/unused buildings ==