SkipCaptcha
3,995
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 247:
Line 247: +
Talk:Donald Trump achievements (view source)
Revision as of 20:48, June 25, 2017
, 20:48, June 25, 2017→Border patrol raid --> appropriate to add?: response
:Also, the fact that I am updating this article every day is a good thing -- ''not'' a bad thing. This way, I am able to catch the smaller, but still meaningful, stories that might be next-to-impossible to find at the end of the year. Achievements are achievements regardless of the size. The fact that these small achievements are actually being made it remarkable considering the inability of the government to fix such things before this administration. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 09:41, 25 June 2017 (EDT)
:Also, the fact that I am updating this article every day is a good thing -- ''not'' a bad thing. This way, I am able to catch the smaller, but still meaningful, stories that might be next-to-impossible to find at the end of the year. Achievements are achievements regardless of the size. The fact that these small achievements are actually being made it remarkable considering the inability of the government to fix such things before this administration. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 09:41, 25 June 2017 (EDT)
::Just because other Conservapedia editors were willing to cut you some slack during the first 100 days when Trump's critics challenged Trump to live up to his promises to get a lot of policies accomplished, does not mean that the same approach is workable for longer time periods. When encyclopedia users come to this article with questions, what information do they seek? We are not trying to duplicate whitehouse.gov. "Some of these accomplishments may be small, but they are clearly accomplishments." is a debatable conclusion. Everyday, thousands of federal employees go to work and do their jobs -- State Dept. officials vet visa applicants; they process social security claims; USDA inspectors stop bad beef; Justice Dept. prosecutes criminals. Ninty-nine percent of the work of the federal government is being done the same way as on Jan 19. The proposed criteria does not make sense. If an employee was doing things that further conservative goals during all eight years of the Obama administration (for example, stopping deporting an illegal immigrant) it is not worth inclusion if he did it again after Jan 20. This article should explain how Donald Trump's approach to government is different than before, what steps he is taking to change things, and whether he has succeeded or failed on each of those steps. You write, "His 2016 election is the only reason ''any'' of this is happening," but have not incorporated that "but for" test in your proposed criteria. How does the Arizona border camp raid meet your criteria? Thanks, [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 16:48, 25 June 2017 (EDT)
== VA to deal with under/unused buildings ==
== VA to deal with under/unused buildings ==