Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, move, oversight, protect, rollback, Administrators
51,035
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 256:
Line 256: +
Talk:Donald Trump achievements (view source)
Revision as of 17:34, June 29, 2017
, 17:34, June 29, 2017→Border patrol raid --> appropriate to add?
:::::The way this article is organized is good. We are including real achievements that we know are achievements because they are reported in reliable media outlets. Even IF something happens to a Trump achievement in the future, we will either make a note or move it to the "failure" section. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 11:44, 26 June 2017 (EDT)
:::::The way this article is organized is good. We are including real achievements that we know are achievements because they are reported in reliable media outlets. Even IF something happens to a Trump achievement in the future, we will either make a note or move it to the "failure" section. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 11:44, 26 June 2017 (EDT)
::::::If a home-schooled high school student is assigned to write a report on Donald Trump, how would he go about using this article? Most wiki editors can tell the difference between trivia and major items, without waiting 100 years. I am sure that we can come up with some threshold for inclusion. [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 13:20, 29 June 2017 (EDT)
::::::If a home-schooled high school student is assigned to write a report on Donald Trump, how would he go about using this article? Most wiki editors can tell the difference between trivia and major items, without waiting 100 years. I am sure that we can come up with some threshold for inclusion. [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 13:20, 29 June 2017 (EDT)
:::::::This is rediculous. Multiple conservative media sites are reporting on all of these achievements as achievements. We don't need to have a criteria because multiple reliable sources are doing it for us. '''''None''''' of the items here are "trivia". Breitbart, Fox News, the Washington Times, the Washington Examiner, the Washington Free Beacon, and even non-conservative sources such as The Hill view these achievements as true achievements. Are we going to defy them? That is not a wise thing to do. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 13:34, 29 June 2017 (EDT)
== VA to deal with under/unused buildings ==
== VA to deal with under/unused buildings ==