Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 297: Line 297:  
This article is about "Donald Trump's achievements." I understand that the President plays a role in nominating judges and the federal government is frequently litigating specific cases, but under the doctrine of separation of powers, by definition decisions by the Judicial branch are not his achievements.  I would recommend deleting the section.  I respectfully question the competence of the people who have contributed the items written thus far in this section. Thanks, [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 09:09, 29 June 2017 (EDT)
 
This article is about "Donald Trump's achievements." I understand that the President plays a role in nominating judges and the federal government is frequently litigating specific cases, but under the doctrine of separation of powers, by definition decisions by the Judicial branch are not his achievements.  I would recommend deleting the section.  I respectfully question the competence of the people who have contributed the items written thus far in this section. Thanks, [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 09:09, 29 June 2017 (EDT)
 
:I strongly disagree, and when you say that "''I respectfully question the competence of the people who have contributed the items written thus far in this section''", I know you are only referring to me. What happened to your call to end [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:1990%27sguy&diff=1357153&oldid=1357028 "false personal attacks on other editors"]? There is no denying that a president has a huge influence on Supreme Court descisions, and the Court was a big issue in the campaign. Imagine if Clinton got a judge confirmed? --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 09:17, 29 June 2017 (EDT)
 
:I strongly disagree, and when you say that "''I respectfully question the competence of the people who have contributed the items written thus far in this section''", I know you are only referring to me. What happened to your call to end [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:1990%27sguy&diff=1357153&oldid=1357028 "false personal attacks on other editors"]? There is no denying that a president has a huge influence on Supreme Court descisions, and the Court was a big issue in the campaign. Imagine if Clinton got a judge confirmed? --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 09:17, 29 June 2017 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Navajo coal power plant ==
 +
 +
A coal power plant will remain operational at least through 2019. I'm not sure if this was the result of the Trump Administration (the Breitbart article suggests that the Interior Department played a main role in it), but either way, it does not seem like this is appropriate to add here.[http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jun/28/embattled-navajo-coal-power-plant-survive-through-/][http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/06/28/trump-keeping-promise-to-navajo-nation-miners-interior-announces-lease-extension-on-arizona-coal-operations/] --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]])
Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, move, oversight, protect, rollback, Administrators
51,035

edits

Navigation menu