SkipCaptcha
3,995
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 297:
Line 297: +
Talk:Donald Trump achievements (view source)
Revision as of 21:30, June 29, 2017
, 21:30, June 29, 2017→Notable Court Cases: response
This article is about "Donald Trump's achievements." I understand that the President plays a role in nominating judges and the federal government is frequently litigating specific cases, but under the doctrine of separation of powers, by definition decisions by the Judicial branch are not his achievements. I would recommend deleting the section. I respectfully question the competence of the people who have contributed the items written thus far in this section. Thanks, [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 09:09, 29 June 2017 (EDT)
This article is about "Donald Trump's achievements." I understand that the President plays a role in nominating judges and the federal government is frequently litigating specific cases, but under the doctrine of separation of powers, by definition decisions by the Judicial branch are not his achievements. I would recommend deleting the section. I respectfully question the competence of the people who have contributed the items written thus far in this section. Thanks, [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 09:09, 29 June 2017 (EDT)
:I strongly disagree, and when you say that "''I respectfully question the competence of the people who have contributed the items written thus far in this section''", I know you are only referring to me. What happened to your call to end [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:1990%27sguy&diff=1357153&oldid=1357028 "false personal attacks on other editors"]? There is no denying that a president has a huge influence on Supreme Court descisions, and the Court was a big issue in the campaign. Imagine if Clinton got a judge confirmed? --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 09:17, 29 June 2017 (EDT)
:I strongly disagree, and when you say that "''I respectfully question the competence of the people who have contributed the items written thus far in this section''", I know you are only referring to me. What happened to your call to end [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:1990%27sguy&diff=1357153&oldid=1357028 "false personal attacks on other editors"]? There is no denying that a president has a huge influence on Supreme Court descisions, and the Court was a big issue in the campaign. Imagine if Clinton got a judge confirmed? --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 09:17, 29 June 2017 (EDT)
::Here is a simple solution: '''limit this page to judicial nominations and appointments. If there is a Supreme Court case that you want to write about, do it in a separate article. If there is a judge that you want to write about, start a biography article for that judge. If a case affects an existing bullet, add a reference to the case in that original bullet.''' Anyone with an understanding of Article III of the Constitution would not dare to call the stuff in this section "Donald Trump achievements." For example, the Binderup v. Holder case that you added yesterday, really started in 2013, and the court received petitions to hear the case in January. They declined to hear the case. How is that a "Donald Trump achievement?" Is there anything in your background or training that would equip you to successfully summarize and accurately cover complex judicial proceedings? This section requires a different skill set than seems to be involved in the other parts of the page. Thanks, [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 17:30, 29 June 2017 (EDT)
== Navajo coal power plant ==
== Navajo coal power plant ==
A coal power plant will remain operational at least through 2019. I'm not sure if this was the result of the Trump Administration (the Breitbart article suggests that the Interior Department played a main role in it), but either way, it does not seem like this is appropriate to add here.[http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jun/28/embattled-navajo-coal-power-plant-survive-through-/][http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/06/28/trump-keeping-promise-to-navajo-nation-miners-interior-announces-lease-extension-on-arizona-coal-operations/] --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]])
A coal power plant will remain operational at least through 2019. I'm not sure if this was the result of the Trump Administration (the Breitbart article suggests that the Interior Department played a main role in it), but either way, it does not seem like this is appropriate to add here.[http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jun/28/embattled-navajo-coal-power-plant-survive-through-/][http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/06/28/trump-keeping-promise-to-navajo-nation-miners-interior-announces-lease-extension-on-arizona-coal-operations/] --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]])