Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, move, oversight, protect, rollback, Administrators
51,035
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 266:
Line 266: + +
Talk:Donald Trump achievements (view source)
Revision as of 15:27, July 3, 2017
, 15:27, July 3, 2017→Border patrol raid --> appropriate to add?
:::::::This is rediculous. Multiple conservative media sites are reporting on all of these achievements as achievements. We don't need to have a criteria because multiple reliable sources are doing it for us. '''''None''''' of the items here are "trivia". Breitbart, Fox News, the Washington Times, the Washington Examiner, the Washington Free Beacon, and even non-conservative sources such as The Hill view these achievements as true achievements. Are we going to defy them? That is not a wise thing to do. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 13:34, 29 June 2017 (EDT)
:::::::This is rediculous. Multiple conservative media sites are reporting on all of these achievements as achievements. We don't need to have a criteria because multiple reliable sources are doing it for us. '''''None''''' of the items here are "trivia". Breitbart, Fox News, the Washington Times, the Washington Examiner, the Washington Free Beacon, and even non-conservative sources such as The Hill view these achievements as true achievements. Are we going to defy them? That is not a wise thing to do. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 13:34, 29 June 2017 (EDT)
::::::::The above statement shows a serious lack of judgment. Do you have any specific instances where the Washington Times or the Washington Examiner called one of your more questionable items an "achievement"? The Washington Times is an organization that employs journalists/reporter to gather news from primary sources. Breitbart is a website that pays a few people, most of whom have no journalism training, to work at home and meet a quota of web postings based upon other information on the web instead of gathering facts directly. Similarly, the Washington Examiner has journalist who write news stories. The editors of CP are making the judgment as to whether the underlying item is or is not a "Donald Trump achievement." We need some criteria here because it looks as though '''any''' mention on the web of something involving the federal government is assumed to be a "Donald Trump achievement." Just because Breitbart imposes a daily quota for their website does not mean that we have a daily quota of new "Donald Trump achievements." Thanks, [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 08:50, 3 July 2017 (EDT)
::::::::The above statement shows a serious lack of judgment. Do you have any specific instances where the Washington Times or the Washington Examiner called one of your more questionable items an "achievement"? The Washington Times is an organization that employs journalists/reporter to gather news from primary sources. Breitbart is a website that pays a few people, most of whom have no journalism training, to work at home and meet a quota of web postings based upon other information on the web instead of gathering facts directly. Similarly, the Washington Examiner has journalist who write news stories. The editors of CP are making the judgment as to whether the underlying item is or is not a "Donald Trump achievement." We need some criteria here because it looks as though '''any''' mention on the web of something involving the federal government is assumed to be a "Donald Trump achievement." Just because Breitbart imposes a daily quota for their website does not mean that we have a daily quota of new "Donald Trump achievements." Thanks, [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 08:50, 3 July 2017 (EDT)
:::::::::It is clear when reading the articles that the Trump Administration instituted a change of some kind, and that the change advances conservative ideals. What more do we need? We can use common sense? Right? And you're demeaning good conservative news sources. Breitbart and the other news outlets are '''not''' low-level blogs, and their journalists are '''not''' unable to tell between a descision that advances and one that hinders conservative views.
:::::::::It seems like you are changing your argument, because earlier in this section, ''you advocated for'' establishing a quota in how many achievements we can add. We are not going to add quotas, and we are not going to add silly and bureaucratic "criteria" beyond the requirement that it advances conservative ideals. Following this common-sense requirement does '''not''' show "a serious lack of judgment." We use your common sense, and our common sense is supported by many different news outlets that do now have the leftist bias of outlets like CNN and the NYT (which hide Trump's achievements and emphasize silly "Russia" controversies). --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 11:27, 3 July 2017 (EDT)
== VA to deal with under/unused buildings ==
== VA to deal with under/unused buildings ==