Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, move, oversight, protect, rollback, Administrators
51,035
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 314:
Line 314: + +
Talk:Donald Trump achievements (view source)
Revision as of 15:30, July 3, 2017
, 15:30, July 3, 2017→Notable Court Cases
::::::At least until a new court case occurs, the federal government cannot deny Second Amendment rights to people who committed nonviolent crimes. This seems like a victory for the Second Amendment to me. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 12:31, 30 June 2017 (EDT)
::::::At least until a new court case occurs, the federal government cannot deny Second Amendment rights to people who committed nonviolent crimes. This seems like a victory for the Second Amendment to me. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 12:31, 30 June 2017 (EDT)
:::::::Please go back and re-read the Third Circuit decision (which pre-dated the Trump Administration) as well as the Conservapedia article. There is a state gun ban statute, which is still on the books and not ruled "unconstitutional". There is continues to be an opportunity for a person to apply to the ATF for a waiver, which is denied in many cases. There is an opportunity to file a lawsuit in Federal District Court to challenge whether the Second Amendment as applied to a person's facts makes the prohibition unconstitutional. The Third Circuit said that the burden of proof shifts to the government, not that there is a ''per se'' right of persons convicted of a crime punishable by more than two years imprisonment to carry a gun. If you don't have the skills to write about court cases, please stop. [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 09:02, 3 July 2017 (EDT)
:::::::Please go back and re-read the Third Circuit decision (which pre-dated the Trump Administration) as well as the Conservapedia article. There is a state gun ban statute, which is still on the books and not ruled "unconstitutional". There is continues to be an opportunity for a person to apply to the ATF for a waiver, which is denied in many cases. There is an opportunity to file a lawsuit in Federal District Court to challenge whether the Second Amendment as applied to a person's facts makes the prohibition unconstitutional. The Third Circuit said that the burden of proof shifts to the government, not that there is a ''per se'' right of persons convicted of a crime punishable by more than two years imprisonment to carry a gun. If you don't have the skills to write about court cases, please stop. [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 09:02, 3 July 2017 (EDT)
::::::::I don't care about the Third Court's descison (other than the outcome). I care about the fact that the Supreme Court, well into the Trump Administration, chose not to hear the case and let the pro-Second Amendment ruling stand. If state laws still exist, and if there are any other parts of it that I did not get, we can simply modify the wording to make this clear.
::::::::Once again, I am going to ask Andy about this. He is a lawyer and thus presumably someone very knowledgable about legal issues. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 11:30, 3 July 2017 (EDT)
== Navajo coal power plant ==
== Navajo coal power plant ==