Changes

:::::What do you think about this: we keep the fact that the Queen has signed these pieces of legislation, but we include the fact that there is a precedent not to interfere with Parliament, regardless of what they pass? --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 17:20, 20 August 2017 (EDT)

:::::What do you think about this: we keep the fact that the Queen has signed these pieces of legislation, but we include the fact that there is a precedent not to interfere with Parliament, regardless of what they pass? --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 17:20, 20 August 2017 (EDT)

::::::As I stated, it makes no difference to me; it is a silly claim, based upon ignorance of the limits of executive power, ignorance of history, ignorance of the constitutional brake, and ignorance of the overriding principle of [[representative democracy]]. I've attempted to "fix" it, my "fix" was rejected. It's clear that you have subversive editors here who are making your articles appear silly. I don't have time to debate this any further: I must instead telephone all of my friends in NYC to warn them of the apocalypse. [[User:NeilWalker|NeilWalker]] ([[User talk:NeilWalker|talk]]) 18:14, 20 August 2017 (EDT)

::::::As I stated, it makes no difference to me; it is a silly claim, based upon ignorance of the limits of executive power, ignorance of history, ignorance of the constitutional brake, and ignorance of the overriding principle of [[representative democracy]]. I've attempted to "fix" it, my "fix" was rejected. It's clear that you have subversive editors here who are making your articles appear silly. I don't have time to debate this any further: I must instead telephone all of my friends in NYC to warn them of the apocalypse. [[User:NeilWalker|NeilWalker]] ([[User talk:NeilWalker|talk]]) 18:14, 20 August 2017 (EDT)