SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
8,856
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 739:
Line 739: + + + +
→Yet another merger candidate: new section
:That makes sense I suppose, and we do discourage "stub" articles. However, it is also generally frowned upon to replace articles with redirects. This should be done with caution, if at all, and all material must be saved. I will look more into it, but please do be careful about this. Thanks! --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</sup> 09:57, 5 March 2018 (EST)
:That makes sense I suppose, and we do discourage "stub" articles. However, it is also generally frowned upon to replace articles with redirects. This should be done with caution, if at all, and all material must be saved. I will look more into it, but please do be careful about this. Thanks! --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</sup> 09:57, 5 March 2018 (EST)
== Yet another merger candidate ==
There are two similarly named articles. One is titled "Internet Crime" (note the capitalization) and contains a significant amount of information. The other is titled "Internet crime" and has virtually nothing in it (the history only shows two changes, one to create it in 2009 and the other to lock it almost immediately thereafter). My suggestion is to unlock the empty article (which you admins can do) and turn it into a redirect page. [[User:Quidam65|Quidam65]] ([[User talk:Quidam65|talk]]) 19:09, 9 March 2018 (EST)