Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, Moderators, move, oversight, protect, ratelimit-exempt, rollback
19,940
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 743:
Line 743: + +
→Yet another merger candidate: re
There are two similarly named articles. One is titled "Internet Crime" (note the capitalization) and contains a significant amount of information. The other is titled "Internet crime" and has virtually nothing in it (the history only shows two changes, one to create it in 2009 and the other to lock it almost immediately thereafter). My suggestion is to unlock the empty article (which you admins can do) and turn it into a redirect page. [[User:Quidam65|Quidam65]] ([[User talk:Quidam65|talk]]) 19:09, 9 March 2018 (EST)
There are two similarly named articles. One is titled "Internet Crime" (note the capitalization) and contains a significant amount of information. The other is titled "Internet crime" and has virtually nothing in it (the history only shows two changes, one to create it in 2009 and the other to lock it almost immediately thereafter). My suggestion is to unlock the empty article (which you admins can do) and turn it into a redirect page. [[User:Quidam65|Quidam65]] ([[User talk:Quidam65|talk]]) 19:09, 9 March 2018 (EST)
:What I'm seeing is a redirect under the name [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Internet_crime&redirect=no Internet crime] which points to [[Internet Crime]]. [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Internet_crimes&redirect=no Internet crimes] is an identical redirect, also. Am I missing something? I don't see a protect page. --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</sup> 01:42, 10 March 2018 (EST)