Changes

On the 7th of January 2015, [[Muslim]] [[jihadism|jihad]] [[terrorist]]s execute [[law enforcement|cops]] on the sidewalk in [[Paris]]. Then calmly walk into the [[satire|satirical]] [[liberal]] [[atheist]] [[newspaper]] [[Charlie Hebdo]]'s office and do the same. Their goal is to [[censorship|silence]] and put in [[fear]] opposition voices to their [[Anti-Americanism]] and [[Islamofascism]] cause.  

On the 7th of January 2015, [[Muslim]] [[jihadism|jihad]] [[terrorist]]s execute [[law enforcement|cops]] on the sidewalk in [[Paris]]. Then calmly walk into the [[satire|satirical]] [[liberal]] [[atheist]] [[newspaper]] [[Charlie Hebdo]]'s office and do the same. Their goal is to [[censorship|silence]] and put in [[fear]] opposition voices to their [[Anti-Americanism]] and [[Islamofascism]] cause.  

The [[Jihadism]] [[apologist]]s within the [[Obama Administration]] suggest that Charles Hebdo exercised bad judgment and brought this upon themselves. "Earnest" [[Obama Administration]] spokesman Josh Earnest said "I’m describing a reason why we have not chosen to use that label because it doesn't seem to accurately describe what had happened."<ref>Hoft, Jim, "[http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2015/01/wh-spokesman-josh-earnest-its-unfair-to-call-americas-enemy-radical-islam-video Whitehouse Spokesman Josh Earnest: It’s “Inaccurate” to Blame Charlie Hebdo Attacks on Radical Islam (Video)].  [[Washington D.C.]]: The Gateway Pundit, Publish January 13, 2015. Accessed January 17, 2015</ref> The [[Obama Administration]] refused to call the [[gun free zone]] slaughter as an act of [[terrorism]].<ref>Ibid.</ref> [[Obama]] [[White House]] Spokesman Josh Earnest said it was “inaccurate” to use the phrase “[[Jihadism|radical Islam]].”.,<ref>Ibid.</ref><ref>Henry, Ed, [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cnAM-7L4E2I "White House Denies Paris Attacks 'Radical Islam']. [[Washington D.C.]], [[Fox News]], Published on Jan 13, 2015. Accessed January 17, 2015.</ref>

The [[Jihadism]] [[apologist]]s within the [[Obama Administration]] suggest that Charles Hebdo exercised bad judgment and brought this upon themselves. "Earnest" [[Obama Administration]] spokesman Josh Earnest said "I’m describing a reason why we have not chosen to use that label because it doesn't seem to accurately describe what had happened."<ref>Hoft, Jim, "[https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2015/01/wh-spokesman-josh-earnest-its-unfair-to-call-americas-enemy-radical-islam-video Whitehouse Spokesman Josh Earnest: It’s “Inaccurate” to Blame Charlie Hebdo Attacks on Radical Islam (Video)].  [[Washington D.C.]]: The Gateway Pundit, Publish January 13, 2015. Accessed January 17, 2015</ref> The [[Obama Administration]] refused to call the [[gun free zone]] slaughter as an act of [[terrorism]].<ref>Ibid.</ref> [[Obama]] [[White House]] Spokesman Josh Earnest said it was “inaccurate” to use the phrase “[[Jihadism|radical Islam]].”.,<ref>Ibid.</ref><ref>Henry, Ed, [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cnAM-7L4E2I "White House Denies Paris Attacks 'Radical Islam']. [[Washington D.C.]], [[Fox News]], Published on Jan 13, 2015. Accessed January 17, 2015.</ref>

==More Liberal Apologists for Radical Islamic Jidaish==

==More Liberal Apologists for Radical Islamic Jidaish==

On September 19, 2012 at the White House daily press briefing then press secretary Jay Carney condemned the judgement of Charlie Hebdo magazine for publishing “deeply offensive,” anti-Islamic cartoons.<ref>Key, Pam, [http://www.breitbart.com/video/2015/01/07/flashback-wh-condemned-judgement-of-deeply-offensive-charlie-hebdo FLASHBACK: WH CONDEMNED JUDGEMENT OF ‘DEEPLY OFFENSIVE’ CHARLIE HEBDO], [[Breitbart]], Published 7 Jan 2015, Accessed January 17, 2015</ref>

On September 19, 2012 at the White House daily press briefing then press secretary Jay Carney condemned the judgement of Charlie Hebdo magazine for publishing “deeply offensive,” anti-Islamic cartoons.<ref>Key, Pam, [https://www.breitbart.com/video/2015/01/07/flashback-wh-condemned-judgement-of-deeply-offensive-charlie-hebdo FLASHBACK: WH CONDEMNED JUDGEMENT OF ‘DEEPLY OFFENSIVE’ CHARLIE HEBDO], [[Breitbart]], Published 7 Jan 2015, Accessed January 17, 2015</ref>

As a nation, we should have a [[truth]] discussion, not [[mainstream media|lamestream medica]] [[liberal media elite|liberal media elitist]] "discussion" on how [[gun control]] destroys public [[:Category:Safety|safety]] and creates victims.

As a nation, we should have a [[truth]] discussion, not [[mainstream media|lamestream medica]] [[liberal media elite|liberal media elitist]] "discussion" on how [[gun control]] destroys public [[:Category:Safety|safety]] and creates victims.

"The situation during the Charlie Hebdo attack was very lopsided–in favor of the terrorists–because of current policing and arms policy. [[Breitbart]] News reported that “unarmed Paris police officers” were forced to flee when confronted with the armed attackers. UK’s Independent reported that “three policemen arrived [at the scene of the attack] on bikes but had to leave because [the attackers] were armed.” A policeman assigned to the duty of body guard to Charlie Hebdo editor Stephane Charbonnier was killed, and an officer on a mountain bike was gunned down."<ref>Hawkins, Awr, [http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2015/01/19/french-police-gun-control-isnt-working-for-us/ FRENCH POLICE: GUN CONTROL ISN’T WORKING FOR US], [[Breitbart]], 19 Jan 2015. Accessed January 21, 2015</ref>

"The situation during the Charlie Hebdo attack was very lopsided–in favor of the terrorists–because of current policing and arms policy. [[Breitbart]] News reported that “unarmed Paris police officers” were forced to flee when confronted with the armed attackers. UK’s Independent reported that “three policemen arrived [at the scene of the attack] on bikes but had to leave because [the attackers] were armed.” A policeman assigned to the duty of body guard to Charlie Hebdo editor Stephane Charbonnier was killed, and an officer on a mountain bike was gunned down."<ref>Hawkins, Awr, [https://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2015/01/19/french-police-gun-control-isnt-working-for-us/ FRENCH POLICE: GUN CONTROL ISN’T WORKING FOR US], [[Breitbart]], 19 Jan 2015. Accessed January 21, 2015</ref>

==Constitutional Carry is the Conservative [[Antiterrorism]] Solution to "Free fire zones"==

==Constitutional Carry is the Conservative [[Antiterrorism]] Solution to "Free fire zones"==

Renowned [[Oath Keepers|Oath Keeper]] [[gun enthusiast]] [[Air Force]] Lt. [[Colonel]] [[Nutnfancy]],<ref>[https://www.youtube.com/user/nutnfancy/about YouTube Channel] has 174,010,430 views and 505,609 subscribers since he  established it on Jul 9, 2006</ref> says "Gun free zones are a LIE. There is no such thing and [[criminal|wolves]] can always get a [[firearm]] into these areas. Given an evildoer with a willingness to die, these areas then become 'free fire zones' where [[shooting|shooters]] have engaged with initial impunity. In these areas, few law abiding citizens possess the most efficient means to stop the killing: the [[gun]]. There are many case studies which prove the abhorrent failure of this [[polyanna|feel-good]] but dangerous policy. It is a misguided and [[corruption|corrupt]] political system that seeks to [[gun control|disarm]] the [[Oath Keepers|good guys]] in some dragnet-type, pseudo-[[:Category:Safety|public safety]] policy that happily disarms ALL [[citizen]]s in the slight hope that the [[terrorist|lawless]] will also comply. They won't and haven't and never will. The 'gun-less' approach has failed miserably in the face of disturbed but motivated [[young mass murderers|mass killer]]s. It continues to cost lives."   

Renowned [[Oath Keepers|Oath Keeper]] [[gun enthusiast]] [[Air Force]] Lt. [[Colonel]] [[Nutnfancy]],<ref>[https://www.youtube.com/user/nutnfancy/about YouTube Channel] has 174,010,430 views and 505,609 subscribers since he  established it on Jul 9, 2006</ref> says "Gun free zones are a LIE. There is no such thing and [[criminal|wolves]] can always get a [[firearm]] into these areas. Given an evildoer with a willingness to die, these areas then become 'free fire zones' where [[shooting|shooters]] have engaged with initial impunity. In these areas, few law abiding citizens possess the most efficient means to stop the killing: the [[gun]]. There are many case studies which prove the abhorrent failure of this [[polyanna|feel-good]] but dangerous policy. It is a misguided and [[corruption|corrupt]] political system that seeks to [[gun control|disarm]] the [[Oath Keepers|good guys]] in some dragnet-type, pseudo-[[:Category:Safety|public safety]] policy that happily disarms ALL [[citizen]]s in the slight hope that the [[terrorist|lawless]] will also comply. They won't and haven't and never will. The 'gun-less' approach has failed miserably in the face of disturbed but motivated [[young mass murderers|mass killer]]s. It continues to cost lives."   

Nutnfancy asserts that "No technology, no system, no law will or can prevent such a determined individual in taking lives. If it isn't the gun, he will find [[knives|other means]] to accomplish his [[violence|brutal]] agenda. The REAL solution is [[political correctness|politically incorrect]] but proven to work: [[firearms|lethal force]] ([[concealed carry]] and/or [[open carry]]) employed immediately by a [[Essay:Sheepdogs for the sheeple|sheepdog]], either [[civilian]], [[Oath Keepers|veteran]] or [[law enforcement]] (also reference [[Nutnfancy]] video 'The [[Essay:Concealed Carry Protocol|Concealed Carry Protocol]]" [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ei8OK4WdoW0 Youtube]). [[Police]] have an unreliable track record in being able to quickly stop the [[young mass murderer|mass murderer]]; they can never arrive in time to prevent [[death]]. Better it is to have responsible citizens [[Everyday carry|armed]] and at the ready and vigilant. The gun will stop the gun and has many times. As in my video 'Close to Engage' ([http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oH3GV7EmzI4 YouTube]) shows, other methodologies exist but all require increased risk and closer contact. Instead we should abolish Gun Free Zones and encourage responsible, mature [[concealed carry|CCW]] holders to prevail in the next [[Charlie Hebdo|mass killing]] by allowing them to have the most effective means of [[self-defense|resistance]]. For some individuals, it may be necessary to engage in 'conscientious objection' against these [[gun control|disarmament]] restrictions. A [[preparedness|prepared]] 'Sheepdog' who is [[courage]]ous, with sound judgment, has been proven to be the real life saver in past mass shootings."  

Nutnfancy asserts that "No technology, no system, no law will or can prevent such a determined individual in taking lives. If it isn't the gun, he will find [[knives|other means]] to accomplish his [[violence|brutal]] agenda. The REAL solution is [[political correctness|politically incorrect]] but proven to work: [[firearms|lethal force]] ([[concealed carry]] and/or [[open carry]]) employed immediately by a [[Essay:Sheepdogs for the sheeple|sheepdog]], either [[civilian]], [[Oath Keepers|veteran]] or [[law enforcement]] (also reference [[Nutnfancy]] video 'The [[Essay:Concealed Carry Protocol|Concealed Carry Protocol]]" [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ei8OK4WdoW0 Youtube]). [[Police]] have an unreliable track record in being able to quickly stop the [[young mass murderer|mass murderer]]; they can never arrive in time to prevent [[death]]. Better it is to have responsible citizens [[Everyday carry|armed]] and at the ready and vigilant. The gun will stop the gun and has many times. As in my video 'Close to Engage' ([https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oH3GV7EmzI4 YouTube]) shows, other methodologies exist but all require increased risk and closer contact. Instead we should abolish Gun Free Zones and encourage responsible, mature [[concealed carry|CCW]] holders to prevail in the next [[Charlie Hebdo|mass killing]] by allowing them to have the most effective means of [[self-defense|resistance]]. For some individuals, it may be necessary to engage in 'conscientious objection' against these [[gun control|disarmament]] restrictions. A [[preparedness|prepared]] 'Sheepdog' who is [[courage]]ous, with sound judgment, has been proven to be the real life saver in past mass shootings."  

Nutnfancy encourages 'Sheepdogs' by saying that "All manner of political pressure should be applied in allowing these individuals to legally possess and carry whatever [[weapons]] are needed that will truly protect the public against these killers. Join and contribute generously to the [[NRA]] and [[NRA-ILA]] as they fights these [[freedom]] battles to genuinely increase public safety."<ref>[[Nutnfancy]], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SEbXuwDiUSo "Gun Free, Death Pay"], [[Utah]] in the [[American Redoubt]], [[YouTube]]. Uploaded on Nov 8, 2009. 116,632 when accessed January 12, 2015.</ref>

Nutnfancy encourages 'Sheepdogs' by saying that "All manner of political pressure should be applied in allowing these individuals to legally possess and carry whatever [[weapons]] are needed that will truly protect the public against these killers. Join and contribute generously to the [[NRA]] and [[NRA-ILA]] as they fights these [[freedom]] battles to genuinely increase public safety."<ref>[[Nutnfancy]], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SEbXuwDiUSo "Gun Free, Death Pay"], [[Utah]] in the [[American Redoubt]], [[YouTube]]. Uploaded on Nov 8, 2009. 116,632 when accessed January 12, 2015.</ref>