| Line 88: |
Line 88: |
| | :::::Andy is spot-on that the courts often are biased against conservatives -- particularly in the liberal-dominated courts before conservatives even began taking serious action to counter judicial activism. Also, I wouldn't view the deep state as authoritative when it reports on left-wing influence within its own ranks. That's almost like an MSM news agency reporting on the level of bias within itself. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 22:47, 23 June 2019 (EDT) | | :::::Andy is spot-on that the courts often are biased against conservatives -- particularly in the liberal-dominated courts before conservatives even began taking serious action to counter judicial activism. Also, I wouldn't view the deep state as authoritative when it reports on left-wing influence within its own ranks. That's almost like an MSM news agency reporting on the level of bias within itself. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 22:47, 23 June 2019 (EDT) |
| | | | |
| − | ==REPLY TO ANDY SCHLAFLY and "Sguy"== | + | ===REPLY TO ANDY SCHLAFLY and "Sguy"=== |
| | | | |
| | ANDY: Nobody rational disputes the notion that there was infiltration into our society by Communists. But acknowledging that does '''NOT''' mean that we must accept '''EVERY lunatic assertion made by political extremists''' (right or left). | | ANDY: Nobody rational disputes the notion that there was infiltration into our society by Communists. But acknowledging that does '''NOT''' mean that we must accept '''EVERY lunatic assertion made by political extremists''' (right or left). |
| Line 212: |
Line 212: |
| | | | |
| | Unfortunately, the Birch Society has a very long history of presenting fabrications and endorsing fiction AND "bad information". [[User:Ernie1241|Ernie1241]] ([[User talk:Ernie1241|talk]])ernie1241[[User:Ernie1241|Ernie1241]] ([[User talk:Ernie1241|talk]]) | | Unfortunately, the Birch Society has a very long history of presenting fabrications and endorsing fiction AND "bad information". [[User:Ernie1241|Ernie1241]] ([[User talk:Ernie1241|talk]])ernie1241[[User:Ernie1241|Ernie1241]] ([[User talk:Ernie1241|talk]]) |
| | + | |
| | + | :You're not going to prove your point through long-winded walls of text. Also, for the past several decades, the U.S. has been slowly creeping toward socialism and has steadily become more liberal in its politics and policy -- led by judicial activists and government bureaucrats (look at historical revisionist teachers in public schools, the left-wing policies advanced by presidential administrations even during Republican presidents, and the influence of organizations such as the CFR in them, as well as public comments of officials in the federal government such as the State Department). We also know that over 90% of federal employees support Democrats, based on info such as donations. Clearly, a strong left-wing influence exists in the federal government, supportive of regulations and globalism. I didn't even address or rely on the JBS in what I just stated (many conservatives believe this), so the JBS's arguments are not unreasonable. |
| | + | |
| | + | :Secondly, in response to your response to me, the Supreme Court had a 1-8 or 2-7 liberal majority (depending on whether you include Burger, who wasn't reliable) in the 1970s. By 2000, it still only had 3 conservative/originalist justices, though O'Connor and Kennedy were more moderate than liberal. Also, I would like to know which "conservative judges" you're referring to. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 13:27, 28 June 2019 (EDT) |