Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
additional flaws
Line 10: Line 10:  
== Lancet study ==
 
== Lancet study ==
   −
A widely publicized study published in the [[Leftist]] ''Lancet'' medical journal in [[England]] suffered from at least three fundamental flaws:<ref>https://melwy.com/blog/lancet-paper-on-chloroquine-is-overhyped-real-world-data-should-not-be-a-black-box</ref>
+
A widely publicized study published about [[[hydroxychloroquine]] (HCQ) in the [[Leftist]] ''Lancet'' medical journal in [[England]] suffered from at least three fundamental flaws:<ref>https://melwy.com/blog/lancet-paper-on-chloroquine-is-overhyped-real-world-data-should-not-be-a-black-box</ref>
 
*No reproducibility
 
*No reproducibility
 
*No traceability of the data
 
*No traceability of the data
 
*No transparency of the review
 
*No transparency of the review
 +
 +
The ''Lancet'' was further flawed in that it did not examine QT intervals and it used high, toxic doses of HCQ.
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
 
{{coronavirus}}
 
{{coronavirus}}
 
[[category:coronavirus]]
 
[[category:coronavirus]]
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,231

edits

Navigation menu