Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
The Lancet study also failed to use zinc in combination with HCQ despite how that combination is widely publicized as the effective protocol.
Line 10: Line 10:  
== Lancet study ==
 
== Lancet study ==
   −
A widely publicized study published about [[[hydroxychloroquine]] (HCQ) in the [[Leftist]] ''Lancet'' medical journal in [[England]] suffered from at least three fundamental flaws:<ref>https://melwy.com/blog/lancet-paper-on-chloroquine-is-overhyped-real-world-data-should-not-be-a-black-box</ref>
+
A widely publicized study published about [[hydroxychloroquine]] (HCQ) in the [[Leftist]] ''Lancet'' medical journal in [[England]] suffered from at least three fundamental flaws:<ref>https://melwy.com/blog/lancet-paper-on-chloroquine-is-overhyped-real-world-data-should-not-be-a-black-box</ref>
 
*No reproducibility
 
*No reproducibility
 
*No traceability of the data
 
*No traceability of the data
 
*No transparency of the review
 
*No transparency of the review
   −
The ''Lancet'' was further flawed in that it did not examine QT intervals and it used high, toxic doses of HCQ.
+
The ''Lancet'' was further flawed in that it did not examine QT intervals, and it used high, toxic doses of HCQ.  The study also failed to use zinc in combination with HCQ despite how that combination is widely publicized as the effective protocol.
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
 
{{coronavirus}}
 
{{coronavirus}}
 
[[category:coronavirus]]
 
[[category:coronavirus]]
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,231

edits

Navigation menu