Changes

By “ignore” she means not bow to Democrats. By “law” she means Democrat [[Voter fraud|election cheating]].

By “ignore” she means not bow to Democrats. By “law” she means Democrat [[Voter fraud|election cheating]].

{{quotebox-float|“Scenario exercises don’t predict the future,” she said, adding, “They explore possible futures: some of the ‘what ifs.’ Our scenario exercises did not end in good places, but it’s important to note that this does not mean that there is something inevitable about chaos and [[constitutional crisis]] in the coming months — just that these particular exercises suggest that these are real possibilities.”}}  

{{quotebox-float|“Scenario exercises don’t predict the future,” she said, adding, “They explore possible futures: some of the ‘what ifs.’ Our scenario exercises did not end in good places, but it’s important to note that this does not mean that there is something inevitable about chaos and [[constitutional crisis]] in the coming months — just that these particular exercises suggest that these are real possibilities.”}}  

She’s training the media and the Democrats on what to say and how to react to a Trump victory or a Biden win by cheating. Her goal is to legitimize cheating. This session also serves to prime the pump of public opinion and get America used to talking about ousting President Trump, no matter the real election result.  Brooks said,  

Through a series of war games, she’s training the media and the Democrats on what to say and how to react to a Trump victory or a Biden win by cheating. Her goal is to legitimize cheating. This session also serves to prime the pump of public opinion and get America used to talking about ousting President Trump, no matter the real election result.  Brooks said,  

{{quotebox-float|“The goal of the exercises was not to give people nightmares, but rather to identify possible inflection points to prevent or mitigate catastrophic outcomes to the 2020 presidential election. … I think the exercises led to some important insights, one being that forewarned is forearmed; in all our exercises, events unfolded very quickly in the days after the election, and those who had thought in advance about the ‘what ifs’ were better positioned to respond than those who had not.”}}

{{quotebox-float|“The goal of the exercises was not to give people nightmares, but rather to identify possible inflection points to prevent or mitigate catastrophic outcomes to the 2020 presidential election. … I think the exercises led to some important insights, one being that forewarned is forearmed; in all our exercises, events unfolded very quickly in the days after the election, and those who had thought in advance about the ‘what ifs’ were better positioned to respond than those who had not.”}}

Through her obfuscation, it is evident what this entire meeting was: Democrat election cheating and stealing boot camp. The “respond” she has in mind is to a legitimate Trump victory. The ostensible reason for the training is a scenario where Trump won’t leave office after a loss. But the actual goal of those who attended is to kill a Trump victory, with the help of the media, in any way they can.<ref>https://www.lifezette.com/2020/07/democrats-already-plotting-to-steal-election-if-trump-wins/?utm_source=thepoliticalinsider.com</ref>

Through her obfuscation, it is evident what this entire meeting was: Democrat election cheating and stealing boot camp. The “respond” she has in mind is to a legitimate Trump victory. The ostensible reason for the training is a scenario where Trump won’t leave office after a loss. But the actual goal of those who attended is to kill a Trump victory, with the help of the media, in any way they can.<ref>https://www.lifezette.com/2020/07/democrats-already-plotting-to-steal-election-if-trump-wins/?utm_source=thepoliticalinsider.com</ref>

Former U.S. Attorney [[Andrew McCarthy]] wrote on the fake basis for the meeting: “There is no rational reason to indulge the anti-Trump hallucination of a defeated president holed up in the Oval Office refusing to leave. If ever any president were to try such an inane thing after the constitutionally mandated divestment of executive authority, he or she would be escorted from the premises — hopefully, with whatever dignity could still be mustered under the circumstances.”

Former U.S. Attorney [[Andrew McCarthy]] wrote about one of the results of the war games, and the fake basis for the meeting: “There is no rational reason to indulge the anti-Trump hallucination of a defeated president holed up in the Oval Office refusing to leave. If ever any president were to try such an inane thing after the constitutionally mandated divestment of executive authority, he or she would be escorted from the premises — hopefully, with whatever dignity could still be mustered under the circumstances.” Another scenario referenced the chaos of the [[United States presidential election, 1876]].

==Protect Democracy Project==

==Protect Democracy Project==

*[https://youtu.be/fuy2ohig2K4 UncoverDC with Tracy Beanz: Elections and Influence Operations], [[Tracy Beanz]], Sep 3, 2020.

*[https://youtu.be/fuy2ohig2K4 UncoverDC with Tracy Beanz: Elections and Influence Operations], [[Tracy Beanz]], Sep 3, 2020.

*[https://theweeklylist.org/the-weeks-in-photos/ The Weekly List] - a weekly timeline compiled by Amy Siskind of New Agenda.

*[https://theweeklylist.org/the-weeks-in-photos/ The Weekly List] - a weekly timeline compiled by Amy Siskind of New Agenda.

{{communism}}

{{communism}}