Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
no edit summary
Line 29: Line 29:  
Through her obfuscation, it is evident what this entire meeting was: Democrat election cheating and stealing boot camp. The “respond” she has in mind is to a legitimate Trump victory. The ostensible reason for the training is a scenario where Trump won’t leave office after a loss. But the actual goal of those who attended is to kill a Trump victory, with the help of the media, in any way they can.<ref>https://www.lifezette.com/2020/07/democrats-already-plotting-to-steal-election-if-trump-wins/?utm_source=thepoliticalinsider.com</ref>
 
Through her obfuscation, it is evident what this entire meeting was: Democrat election cheating and stealing boot camp. The “respond” she has in mind is to a legitimate Trump victory. The ostensible reason for the training is a scenario where Trump won’t leave office after a loss. But the actual goal of those who attended is to kill a Trump victory, with the help of the media, in any way they can.<ref>https://www.lifezette.com/2020/07/democrats-already-plotting-to-steal-election-if-trump-wins/?utm_source=thepoliticalinsider.com</ref>
   −
Former U.S. Attorney [[Andrew McCarthy]] wrote about one of the results of the war games, and the fake basis for the meeting: “There is no rational reason to indulge the anti-Trump hallucination of a defeated president holed up in the Oval Office refusing to leave. If ever any president were to try such an inane thing after the constitutionally mandated divestment of executive authority, he or she would be escorted from the premises — hopefully, with whatever dignity could still be mustered under the circumstances.”  Another scenario referenced the chaos of the [[United States presidential election, 1876]].
+
Former U.S. Attorney [[Andrew McCarthy]] wrote about one of the results of the war games, and the fake basis for the meeting: “There is no rational reason to indulge the anti-Trump hallucination of a defeated president holed up in the Oval Office refusing to leave. If ever any president were to try such an inane thing after the constitutionally mandated divestment of executive authority, he or she would be escorted from the premises — hopefully, with whatever dignity could still be mustered under the circumstances.”  Another scenario referenced the chaos of the [[United States presidential election, 1876]].<ref>[https://www.dailysignal.com/2020/09/10/a-reprise-of-1876-liberal-academic-group-predicts-electoral-showdown-for-2020/ A Reprise of 1876? Liberal Academic Group Predicts Electoral Showdown for 2020]</ref>
    
==Protect Democracy Project==
 
==Protect Democracy Project==
Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, edit, move, protect, rollback
9,147

edits

Navigation menu