Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
293,589
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 48:
Line 48: + + +
no edit summary
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::I never even touched Northwest's main space in the first place, and for the record, that wasn't a personal attack. That was calling you out on your behavior. If he were to engage in a personal attack on you, he would have made an edit saying you liked forceful sodomy, or telling you you should slit your own throat, sort of like what several vandals have done on talk pages and even on user pages (not to mention a few encounters with anon users on other wikis, including one who outright told me to slit my own throat and even posted pictures of decapitated Iraqi men). In fact, how about I actually show [https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User%3ANorthwest&diff=1460945&oldid=1456973 an actual example of a personal attack]. And quite frankly, I'm beginning to think we should be a bit more specific on the rules right now. As far as the question, yes, ultimately, Raffensberger is a credible source of criticism in this article. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 21:07, 11 May 2021 (EDT)
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::I never even touched Northwest's main space in the first place, and for the record, that wasn't a personal attack. That was calling you out on your behavior. If he were to engage in a personal attack on you, he would have made an edit saying you liked forceful sodomy, or telling you you should slit your own throat, sort of like what several vandals have done on talk pages and even on user pages (not to mention a few encounters with anon users on other wikis, including one who outright told me to slit my own throat and even posted pictures of decapitated Iraqi men). In fact, how about I actually show [https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User%3ANorthwest&diff=1460945&oldid=1456973 an actual example of a personal attack]. And quite frankly, I'm beginning to think we should be a bit more specific on the rules right now. As far as the question, yes, ultimately, Raffensberger is a credible source of criticism in this article. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 21:07, 11 May 2021 (EDT)
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::Now you're trolling. You can remove the civility clause violation from NW mainspace to salvage your tag team's credibility if you wish.
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::If you're not going to address why Brad Raffensperger should be used as a source of criticism in the article on Stacy Abrams, this conversation is over. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 21:24, 11 May 2021 (EDT)