Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
5,230
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 51:
Line 51: +
no edit summary
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::If you're not going to address why Brad Raffensperger should be used as a source of criticism in the article on Stacy Abrams, this conversation is over. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 21:24, 11 May 2021 (EDT)
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::If you're not going to address why Brad Raffensperger should be used as a source of criticism in the article on Stacy Abrams, this conversation is over. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 21:24, 11 May 2021 (EDT)
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::I'm not trolling. If anything, that link I provided shows what ACTUAL trolling is like. And I have zero intention of removing it since it's not a civility clause violation by any definition. A call-out =/= civility clause violation. As far as as why it should be used as a source of criticism on Stacy Abrams, simple, it condemns Stacy Abrams, she's a left-winger, and thus it advances Conservativism, so why NOT use it if it aids Conservativism? [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 21:28, 11 May 2021 (EDT)