SkipCaptcha
64
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 333:
Line 333: − +
no edit summary
== POV opinion and conspiracy theories are NOT "facts".... ==
== POV opinion and conspiracy theories are NOT "facts".... ==
Yeah, no...Northwest. The stuff that David added was what anti-Witness conspiracy theorists and "mainstream" biased church theologians PUT IN IN ANTI-JW BLOGS....not a supposedly objective encyclopedia article. David's statement of "conflicting with the Bible's teachings" is a PURE POV OPINION, having nothing to do with neutral encyclopedic anything. Because other people have the opposite view of what David put in...in that regard. It doesn't matter how many contributions and edits you or David has made on this site. David put in ANTI-WITNESS hateful neurotic BLOG JUNK, not professional neutral anything, in those walls of texts there. So then fix wording to make it more neutral and not what "conservapedia" itself thinks. Regards... [[User:Summa Verbius|Summa Verbius]] ([[User talk:Summa Verbius|talk]]) 23:08, 21 May 2021 (EDT)
Hello. Conservapedia leans "conservative" or "right-wing", but it's still supposed to be a fairly neutral objective NPOV encyclopedia, and not a POV ''blog'' of hyper-trinitarians, JW-haters, and anti-Witness conspiracy theorists. There are other websites for that nonsense. NOT Conservapedia. So... Yeah, no...Northwest. The stuff that David added was what anti-Witness conspiracy theorists and "mainstream" biased church theologians PUT IN IN ANTI-JW BLOGS....not a supposedly objective encyclopedia article. David's statement of "conflicting with the Bible's teachings" is a PURE POV OPINION, having nothing to do with neutral encyclopedic anything. Because other people have the opposite view of what David put in...in that regard. It doesn't matter how many contributions and edits you or David has made on this site. David put in ANTI-WITNESS hateful neurotic BLOG JUNK, not professional neutral anything, in those walls of texts there. So then fix wording to make it more neutral and not what "conservapedia" itself thinks. Regards... [[User:Summa Verbius|Summa Verbius]] ([[User talk:Summa Verbius|talk]]) 23:08, 21 May 2021 (EDT)