SkipCaptcha
256
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 6:
Line 6: − ::Very good comments above in this type page. Especially idea of moving criticisms to its own section. I am not sure yet how to use attack page or if there's a way to reply directly to users privately perhaps. I'll watch this page periodically for equivalent to replies. If group permissions regarding editing and invisibility are available these would be very helpful to crowd source section edits but I will understand if this is a relatively advanced feature.--[[User:Fallandtrip|Fallandtrip]] ([[User talk:Fallandtrip|talk]]) 13:27, June 17, 2022 (EDT) − @ previous comments users Thank you for your suggestions. This user finds the suggestions above to be fair, patient and informative. This user has found the learning curve for getting started and making contributions to be higher than anticipated, and is considering whether to delete pages created so far, at least until getting better handle on 'best practices' recently found at link (https://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Editing_article_and_talk_pages#Talk_pages_and_Archiving ) . Regarding thoughts about learning curves, if there was a way to get customizations such as mediawiki equivalent of imagepaste, richtext or cgkedit or equivalent wysiwyg editor that would be desireable. There may good reasons at this time for not having these functions yet. Respects, and much thanks. --[[User:Fallandtrip|Fallandtrip]] ([[User talk:Fallandtrip|talk]]) 19:01, August 3, 2022 (EDT)
Removed 2 of my comments.
::The editorializing can go in a separate ==Criticism== section. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Z+]]</sup> 04:04, June 17, 2022 (EDT)
::The editorializing can go in a separate ==Criticism== section. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Z+]]</sup> 04:04, June 17, 2022 (EDT)