Hi Northwest, when it comes to ChenXiansheng's edits, I notice that they usually attempt to neutralize some particularly dogmatic tones in lead sections of more popular articles. The edit summaries in your reversions indicate that you think his edits aren't "legitimate," which comes off as an unnecessary slander of his evident good-faith attempts to improve several pages. In the future, if you disagree with his edits, please first discuss in the corresponding talk page before undoing them. —[[User:Liberaltears|<code><span style="background:#FF8181">'''LT'''</span></code>]] '''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|<sup>(The Old Right was right!)</sup>]]''''' Thursday, 11:19, November 24, 2022 (EST) | Hi Northwest, when it comes to ChenXiansheng's edits, I notice that they usually attempt to neutralize some particularly dogmatic tones in lead sections of more popular articles. The edit summaries in your reversions indicate that you think his edits aren't "legitimate," which comes off as an unnecessary slander of his evident good-faith attempts to improve several pages. In the future, if you disagree with his edits, please first discuss in the corresponding talk page before undoing them. —[[User:Liberaltears|<code><span style="background:#FF8181">'''LT'''</span></code>]] '''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|<sup>(The Old Right was right!)</sup>]]''''' Thursday, 11:19, November 24, 2022 (EST) |